Implicating third_eye → multi_eye
Link to implication

Reason:

A third eye is having more than the standard 2 eyes.

It seems that in its alias (3 eyes to third eye), this implication was forgotten, as it's still implied on "3 eyes", if you check out its wiki page. I suggest the removal of multi eye from 3 eyes to rectify this as well, as third eye replaces it

facelessmess said:
Implicating third_eye → multi_eye
Link to implication

Reason:

A third eye is having more than the standard 2 eyes.

It seems that in its alias (3 eyes to third eye), this implication was forgotten, as it's still implied on "3 eyes", if you check out its wiki page. I suggest the removal of multi eye from 3 eyes to rectify this as well, as third eye replaces it

Or the alias should be reversed and have 3_eyes implicate to multi_eye.

keep in mind we dont use the text description for tags describing the precise amount of parts of something.

ex:
5_fingers
3_fingers
4_balls
2_heads
4_eyes

eta...

Darou said:

Or the alias should be reversed and have 3_eyes implicate to multi_eye.

keep in mind we dont use the text description for tags describing the precise amount of parts of something.

ex:
5_fingers
3_fingers
4_balls
2_heads
4_eyes

eta...

fair enough, I was just going by this alias suggestion as 3_eyes was already aliased to "third eye", so even if I wanted to it would have barred me from suggesting it

but yeah, that works as well.

I think reversing the alias is the better of the two options

this has bugged me for so long because when the tags were still separate, i suggested aliasing third eye to 3 eyes the alias was just flipped and approved with no discussion or explanation