Aliasing sexual_predator → sex_offender
Link to alias

Reason:

Usage seems to overlap and sex_offender has more posts.

I'm not sure how useful these tags are at all, actually. It just gets tagged on some rape and cub stuff, so maybe they should just be invalidated.

Well, sex_offender seems to have been mostly tagged by a single person, and mostly on cub works, which I would think would just qualify it as a troll tag.

Theres no way to officially police a tag like this. Predator maybe in comics like Stop! MAMORU KUN! but otherwise... this is another purely twyk tag that probably shouldn't exist at all.

Plus One to invalidating both.

It looks like people thought that the older character is a sexual_predator or sex_offender, because they're sexually interacting with a cub.

Naturally, the tags should be invalidated. Because no such laws exist in the world of furry art.

The tags age_difference, domination, smaller/younger_male cover this subject better.

I'd argue that it's appropriate for post #869537.

I see nothing unnatural in that video!

This post on the other hand..

post #5867

+1 to invalidating the tags, they are troll tags that shouldn't exist. Really, these tags go beyond TWYK. Every artist and author creates their own worlds for their creations, only they know the laws and such that govern those worlds. How can we apply our laws to their works? For example, and I am going off memory so I am sure someone will correct me. :D Xennon's bunny race, they were genetically created to be sex slaves, so becoming sexually active early, by our standards, is perfectly normal and not early for them. So putting a 'sexual_offender' tag on it would be ludicrous.

Using TWYS, I agree both tags are invalid. +1 to invalidating the tags, and -1 to the Troll(s) who tagged those posts as such.

I apologize for necro-ing this post, but it's the only one I found discussing this tag and I did not believe making a new one would be kept long due to this one existing. It seems like there are about two people that really use this tag and it seems random as to which images they apply to. How does one know when to add the tag when it's used so sporadically?

Tnomic said:
I apologize for necro-ing this post, but it's the only one I found discussing this tag and I did not believe making a new one would be kept long due to this one existing. It seems like there are about two people that really use this tag and it seems random as to which images they apply to. How does one know when to add the tag when it's used so sporadically?

You shouldn't add it and neither should anyone else. Invalidation is the admins saying 'this is not a good tag, don't add it to posts'.

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
You shouldn't add it and neither should anyone else. Invalidation is the admins saying 'this is not a good tag, don't add it to posts'.

I wasn't really planning on adding it, but it's still being added by others to random posts.

Edit: Okay, I see what you mean now. But at the time, the tag had not been invalidated and was being added randomly to images mostly by two people from what I saw

Tnomic said:
I wasn't really planning on adding it, but it's still being added by others to random posts.

Edit: Okay, I see what you mean now. But at the time, the tag had not been invalidated and was being added randomly to images mostly by two people from what I saw

Ah. Yeah it was invalidated only a couple of hours ago, so that explains it.