Implicating arrow_pointing_to_crotch → directional_arrow
Link to implication

Reason:

The title and description (as well as all currently tagged posts) clearly refer to the pointing kind of arrow, not the... murder-y kind.

That seems like a solid implication. There's only forty images for arrow, though.
Although there are some images where it gets kind of questionable:
(more questionable from left to right)
post #410683 post #295025 post #180124 post #1205081
If we define arrow_pointing_to_crotch so that these images, particularly the last one, are included, directional_arrow should be excluded, since then arrow would be identified as much by its location as its shape, whereas directional_arrow is pretty much all about the shape.

Overall, you have my support. Also, thank you for going ahead and tagging these.

MatrixMash said:
That seems like a solid implication. There's only forty images for arrow, though.
Although there are some images where it gets kind of questionable:
(more questionable from left to right)
post #410683 post #295025 post #180124 post #1205081
If we define arrow_pointing_to_crotch so that these images, particularly the last one, are included, directional_arrow should be excluded, since then arrow would be identified as much by its location as its shape, whereas directional_arrow is pretty much all about the shape.

Yeah, you can blame me for those, I wasn't quite sure how far I could take TWYS on that one. I definitely understand why the last two would count as inappropriate for aliasing (and possibly mistagged), but why do you think the first two are questionable?

Fifteen said:
...why do you think the first two are questionable?

I don't think those two are really questionable; I just included them in case we wanted to discuss how far directional_arrow should extend. My bad for being unclear.