Implicating rito → avian
Link to implication

Reason:

The rito are a species of avian-beings in the zelda series, coming in either bird humanoid form (a la medli) or anthro bird form (a la kass). Whichever form they are in, they are still a pretty obviously avian species as a whole and I feel that warrants at least an implication to avian.

Related zelda character implications

• dark link → the legend of zelda
• darunia → ocarina of time
• deku link → majora's mask
• deku princess → majora's mask
• ganon → the legend of zelda (not same as ganondorf; is beast/porcine form)
• ganondorf → the legend of zelda
• goron link → majora's mask
• fi → skyward sword
• impa → the legend of zelda
• lulu (zelda) → majora's mask
• medli → wind waker
• mipha → breath of the wild
• revali → breath of the wild
• saki (zelda) → breath of the wild
• saria → ocarina of time
• sidon (zelda) → breath of the wild
• skull kid (character) → the legend of zelda
• teba (zelda) → breath of the wild
• tetra (zelda) → wind waker
• tingle → the legend of zelda
• toon link → the legend of zelda
• urbosa → breath of the wild
• young link → the legend of zelda
• zora link → majora's mask

Related zelda species implications

• baba (zelda) → flora fauna
• baba (zelda) → the legend of zelda
• blin (zelda) → the legend of zelda
• deku scrub → flora fauna
• deku scrub → the legend of zelda
• gerudo → humanoid
• gerudo → the legend of zelda
• goron → humanoid
• kokiri → humanoid
• kokiri → the legend of zelda
• korok → flora fauna
• korok → the legend of zelda
• lizalfos → scalie
• lizalfos → the legend of zelda
• lynel → mammal¹
• lynel → the legend of zelda
• minish → humanoid
• minish → minish cap
• mogma → mammal
• mogma → skyward sword
• sheikah → humanoid
• sheikah → the legend of zelda
• skull kid → humanoid
• skull kid → the legend of zelda
• zora → marine

• bokoblin → blin (zelda)
• deku baba → baba (zelda)
• miniblin → blin (zelda)
• moblin → blin (zelda)

Related zelda game implications

• minish cap → the legend of zelda

Related zelda character aliases

• fierce deity → fierce deity link
• prince sidon → sidon (zelda)

Related zelda species aliases

• picori → minish

Related zelda deimplications

• deimplicate the legend of zelda from medli; wind waker will imply it
• deimplicate the legend of zelda from saria; ocarina of time will imply it

¹ Was originally gonna imply this to either equine taur/taur/equine or feline, but there are many cases in which this is just not helpful mainly due to how the top half is feline looking whereas the bottom half is equine. So you often get cases where media involving them either looks just like a plain equine taur, plain equine, or feline. So it's really just not accurate or helpful. Ergo, like how gnoll is implicated, I decided to suggest a base implication to mammal. If disagreed upon then at the very least it should imply the legend of zelda.

I thought we were supposed to avoid tagging individual games within a franchise.

BlueDingo said:
I thought we were supposed to avoid tagging individual games within a franchise.

if there is any then such information is too hidden away to be known by anyone since popular series like mario bros, pokemon or starfox all have tags for their individual games or other merchandise, many of them numbering in the hudreds...

as far as zelda goes i do think individual games should be tagged as not all characters carry over thru all games.
Actual species are another matter.

BlueDingo said:
I thought we were supposed to avoid tagging individual games within a franchise.

I am unsure about this rule, I was mainly just following what I've seen to be general tag standards involving characters that are pretty much exclusive to one installment in a series. Valoo for example has a wind waker implication, being a pretty much exclusive to WW character

To be honest, there isn't much consistency for which games within a franchise are allowed to have tags and implications and which ones can't/don't so I assumed we didn't do it for individual games. Series', on the other hand...

• Super Mario Bros. 1, 2, 3 and 64 are aliased away while Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario 3d World are implicated. Mario and Luigi, and Paper Mario are also implicated but those are series' containing multiple games, not single games.
• Sonic and the Secret Rings is aliased, Sonic Unleashed has a tag but no alias/implication.

BlueDingo said:
To be honest, there isn't much consistency for which games within a franchise are allowed to have tags and implications and which ones can't/don't so I assumed we didn't do it for individual games. Series', on the other hand...

• Super Mario Bros. 1, 2, 3 and 64 are aliased away while Super Mario Galaxy and Super Mario 3d World are implicated. Mario and Luigi, and Paper Mario are also implicated but those are series' containing multiple games, not single games.
• Sonic and the Secret Rings is aliased, Sonic Unleashed has a tag but no alias/implication.

My assumption is that the implications are created when a character/species unique to it becomes incredibly popular, and maybe that's why it's implicated and not aliased away? Like with midna and her twilight princess implication. I assume the same was meant for unleashed, due to werehog's existence, but maybe the creation of the implication was forgotten? Who knows

The individual franchises are good for when there are different forms, such as with Moblins and Lizalfos, but if a species only ever showed up in one game, there's no need.