Implicating ducktales_(2017) → disney
Link to implication
Reason:
Ducktales is a Disney copyright.
Updated by SnowWolf
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Implicating ducktales_(2017) → disney
Link to implication
Ducktales is a Disney copyright.
Updated by SnowWolf
Chaser said:
Implicating ducktales_(2017) → disney
Link to implicationReason:
Ducktales is a Disney copyright.
I'd rather implicate ducktales_(2017) to ducktales (since one, it's part of the same franchise, and two, not everyone is going to think of searching with the all important year disambiguation at first) and implicate the latter to disney, so both would be covered.
Updated by anonymous
BooruHitomi said:
I'd rather implicate ducktales_(2017) to ducktales (since one, it's part of the same franchise, and two, not everyone is going to think of searching with the all important year disambiguation at first) and implicate the latter to disney, so both would be covered.
Should we first tempalias the old posts to a different tag so that people who want the old ones can find them still?
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Should we first tempalias the old posts to a different tag so that people who want the old ones can find them still?
If that's the case, then we should make ducktales_(1987) a tag for characters exclusively to or styled after how they appear in the classic series, while ducktales should be for the franchise overall.
Updated by anonymous
I do think there should be a differentiation between the two... on the other hand, there are only about 200 posts and MOST of them seem to be new ducktales... so perhaps the differentiation's moot?
Updated by anonymous