for me i think the idea of dickgirls are like a double edged sword. they can serve as the replacement for men, and are sometimes fun to see in action. but on the other hand, if dickgirls did exist then man would have no purpose. unless dickgirls were incapable of impregnating regular women. what you guys think? do you love dickgirls? or hate them?

What do I think?

I think this thread is creepy, inane and very disturbing.

In other words,

post #272028

ToddRogue69 said:
if dickgirls did exist then man would have no purpose.

They do exist. Some men get fake boobs and some women get penises via surgery

Ryuzaki_Izawa said:
What do I think?

I think this thread is creepy and very disturbing.

In other words,

post #272028

+1.

Inane topic is inane.

Just to answer the question at the end:

I'm weird in that I find full-blown herms pretty hot (at least the unrealistic furry variety), but once it's technically just a guy with boobs I'm completely indifferent, yet strip away those boobs too and you'd end up with a feminine guy, which I think is the shit.

Yeah, can't make sense of that either.

when this thread gets locked, let's make one about cuntboys

Can we have a thread about pansexual herbivore lioness male herms?

ToddRogue69 said:
how do you feel about the idea of dickgirls?

Yes. <3

A penis and boobs?
Sounds great to me.

ToddRogue69 said:
if dickgirls did exist then man would have no purpose.

post #135690

u srs

SirAntagonist said:
post #135690

u srs

Nah.

Dickgirls are not fertile.

ToddRogue69 said:
...if dickgirls did exist...

You should look up newhalfs.

Zedee said:
That they're pretty damn gay.

Not that it's a bad thing though

That's like calling ultraviolet 'pretty damn purple'.

I think 'pretty damn bi' is much more appropriate here.

Ryuzaki_Izawa said:
What do I think?

I think this thread is creepy, inane and very disturbing.

In other words,

post #272028

look. i got bored so i just decided to talk about what was on my mind at the time, so don't be hating on ToddRogue!

ToddRogue69 said:
look. i got bored so i just decided to talk about what was on my mind at the time, so don't be hating on ToddRogue!

Don't refer to yourself in the 3rd person.
Only royalty and assholes do that.

ToddRogue69 said:
look. i got bored so i just decided to talk about what was on my mind at the time, so don't be hating on ToddRogue!

That's what the blips are for. The forum is mainly for tag and site discussion.

Halite said:
Only royalty and assholes do that.

Aren’t those pretty much mutually inclusive?

Kämpfer said:
Aren’t those pretty much mutually inclusive?

Not all assholes are royalty, and not all royalty are assholes.
The Venn diagram would have a small circle of royalty almost completely, but not quite, inside of the significantly larger asshole circle.

Dickgirls are a very hated thing by me.

Not because they have the genitals they do or that I think it is wrong.

I just absolutely hate the concept of something with penis and testicles (and not always a vagina) being called a "girl" because of breasts.

_Waffles_ said:
Dickgirls are a very hated thing by me.

Not because they have the genitals they do or that I think it is wrong.

I just absolutely hate the concept of something with penis and testicles (and not always a vagina) being called a "girl" because of breasts.

So really, you hate the word dickgirls, rather than actually hating dickgirls.

Well, feel free to propose an alternative that maintains the distinction vs 'herm'

savageorange said:
Well, feel free to propose an alternative that maintains the distinction vs 'herm'

There's the (apparently derogatory) "shemale". Maybe the cuntboy version could be "hemale", and we can call anything that has more than one set of appropriate genitalia (ie. worse than herms) "itmales".

Clawstripe said:
There's the (apparently derogatory) "shemale". Maybe the cuntboy version could be "hemale", and we can call anything that has more than one set of appropriate genitalia (ie. worse than herms) "itmales".

SheMan - Mastress of the Universe(tm)

Munkelzahn said:
SheMan - Mastress of the Universe(tm)

In the furry fandom it'd be more like Matress of the Universe.

NotMeNotYou said:
In the furry fandom it'd be more like Mattress of the Universe.

Funnily enough, this is actually how I originally read that sentence. Obviously I need to get outside more often...

furrypickle said:
Funnily enough, this is actually how I originally read that sentence. Obviously I need to get outside more often...

Not really, since mastress isn't actually a word.
The female form of "master" is "mistress".

Halite said:
Not really, since mastress isn't actually a word.
The female form of "master" is "mistress".

It's a portmanteau
because "master" is male and "mistress" is female
but She-Man(tm) is both

Munkelzahn said:
It's a portmanteau
because "master" is male and "mistress" is female
but She-Man(tm) is both

Except that mastress is still not a word.

Halite said:
Except that mastress is still not a word.

You fail at understanding what a word is.

Halite said:
Except that mastress is still not a word.

It is now that it's been coined. ;p

Clawstripe said:
It is now that it's been coined. ;p

That's not how words work.

_Waffles_ said:
Dickgirls are a very hated thing by me.

Not because they have the genitals they do or that I think it is wrong.

I just absolutely hate the concept of something with penis and testicles (and not always a vagina) being called a "girl" because of breasts.

Does that mean that fat guys are women now?
They have breasts.

Halite said:
That's not how words work.

A word is just a collection of characters and/or sounds that convey a concept. I'd say mastress succeeds that criteria. May not ever become a common term, but it *is* now a word. :P

Halite said:
That's not how words work.

It's a neologism or nonce word coined to fit a particular situation, in this case to pun on 'master'.

Halite said:
That's not how words work.

Oh, well, if words have to not be made up in order to mean anything, sorry, I couldn't understand your comment, it contained no words that are not made up.

What would a word that isn't made up even be? It's an oxymoron.

Words are created by common agreement.
Not by individuals.

Halite said:
Words are created by common agreement.
Not by individuals.

Centrifugal Force

:3

furballs_dc said:
Centrifugal Force

:3

Is it sad that I thought "centripetal force" before clicking the link and reading the comic?

Halite said:
Is it sad that I thought "centripetal force" before clicking the link and reading the comic?

:P

Halite said:
Words are created by common agreement.
Not by individuals.

That's like saying forests are not created by individual trees. Not really true, just misleading.

savageorange said:
That's like saying forests are not created by individual trees. Not really true, just misleading.

Your analogy is flawed.
Also, 1 tree is not a forest.

Yeah, this thread has ran its course