Aliasing ambigous_[something] → ambiguous_[something]
Link to alias
Reason:
Because it's a bloody awful word to spell to!
Updated by SnowWolf
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Aliasing ambigous_[something] → ambiguous_[something]
Link to alias
Because it's a bloody awful word to spell to!
Updated by SnowWolf
That would be a lot of aliases.
Updated by anonymous
Why? Neither tag has any posts.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Why? Neither tag has any posts.
What OP means is all tags with ambiguous in it, not just that one tag
Updated by anonymous
BlackLicorice said:
What OP means is all tags with ambiguous in it, not just that one tag
Thanks for clarifying:)
As said, what I mean are all the tags in the style of ambigous_gender, ambigous_species and also things like male/ambigous.
gender and male currently have posts. Easy fix but I feel like typos are a rather common reason for 1-post tags. Then again it is a lot of aliases :/
Updated by anonymous
Chaser said:
That would be a lot of aliases.
Is there a way for admins to just alias *ambigous* to *ambiguous* if you understand what I mean, whithout manually making a thousand aliases?
Updated by anonymous
MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Is there a way for admins to just alias *ambigous* to *ambiguous* if you understand what I mean, whithout manually making a thousand aliases?
Sadly not-- but it's probably for the better: If they could, there would probably somehow be a lot of 'false positive' hit by it too, somehow.
That said... What about some shortcuts? like...
- | - |
---|---|
ambiguous_gender | ambgen, ambgender |
ambiguous_penetration | ambpen, ambpenetration |
ambiguous_species | ambspe, ambspecies |
ambiguous_fluids | ambfluid, ambfluids |
ambiguous_form | ambform |
ambiguous/ambiguous | amb/amb |
and everything else has less than 100 tags.
*picks up broom, goes to clean up some typo tags.*
Updated by anonymous
SnowWolf said:
Sadly not-- but it's probably for the better: If they could, there would probably somehow be a lot of 'false positive' hit by it too, somehow.That said... What about some shortcuts? like...
- - ambiguous_gender ambgen, ambgender ambiguous_penetration ambpen, ambpenetration ambiguous_species ambspe, ambspecies ambiguous_fluids ambfluid, ambfluids ambiguous_form ambform ambiguous/ambiguous amb/amb and everything else has less than 100 tags.
*picks up broom, goes to clean up some typo tags.*
we already have shortcut for the ambiguous/ambiguous and other ambiguous/*gender* tags at least, its ?/?, ?/m, ?/f and so on
so i think that ?_gender, ?_form etc would be best option for other shortcuts
Updated by anonymous
Commander_Eggplant said:
we already have shortcut for the ambiguous/ambiguous and other ambiguous/*gender* tags at least, its ?/?, ?/m, ?/f and so onso i think that ?_gender, ?_form etc would be best option for other shortcuts
oooh, nice-- I checked the others but not that one, haha. Serves me right :P
they also seem to use a/a and 'a' instead of ? in some places so... maybe there might be some benefit of a_gender etc? But ? is probably more than good enough :)
Updated by anonymous