Updated by Mairo
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Updated by Mairo
Random said:
Implicating human_only → human
Link to implicationReason:
If it's only humans, there's humans.
Except that human-only posts aren't allowed here and get deleted, So the tag is useless.
Updated by anonymous
FoxFourOhFour said:
Except that human-only posts aren't allowed here and get deleted, So the tag is useless.
There are older images that are exempt from deletion. Human-only comic pages may be allowed.
Updated by anonymous
FoxFourOhFour said:
Except that human-only posts aren't allowed here and get deleted, So the tag is useless.
Except human only posts are allowed here and aren't deleted, so the tag is useful. All it requires is to be a part of a pool that is relevant.
Updated by anonymous
+1. Remembering that a "human only" post is allowed if it is part of a series of pics featuring site-relevant content (usually comics or transformation sequences).
Note: I can't see any logical reason for those old, 0% site-relevant, posts being around, though (to avoiding "punishing" the posters Isn't a logical reason).
Updated by anonymous
I'm somewhat wary of this, because it could lead to users trying to add other *_only tags. But if it is kept, also implicate to not_furry.
Oh, there's already furry_only. Pointless because of -not_furry, and would have to be tagged for way too many posts.
Updated by anonymous
+1 implying human and not_furry.
I got rid of furry_only. What idiot thought it was a good idea to make a tag that applies to 87% of the posts on the site?
Updated by anonymous
leomole said:
+1 implying human and not_furry.I got rid of furry_only. What idiot thought it was a good idea to make a tag that applies to 87% of the posts on the site?
furry_only should also be aliased to invalid_tag, just to make sure it's never used again.
Updated by anonymous
I messaged anyone who used the tag recently, hopefully that's enough to keep it from coming back.
Updated by anonymous
Furrin_Gok said:
Except human only posts are allowed here and aren't deleted, so the tag is useful. All it requires is to be a part of a pool that is relevant.
This is most definitely one of the most misunderstood thing on this site. Even recently I have seen users saying that human artwork is fine as long as it is good and got dmail saying I did wrong deletion as human only artwork is acceptable.
It's much easier to say it this way to avoid any confusion: human only posts are NOT allowed, this excludes posts in pool containing directly related posts or if post has really strong direct connection with other relevant post, e.g. two page comic or same image from two angles where other would be deemed irrelevant.
Updated by anonymous