Implicating snake_penis → penis
Link to implication

Reason:

A snake_penis is still veritably a penis

EDIT: The tag implication snake_penis -> penis (forum #253677) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Shouldn't this be a hemipen-- oh.

Oh.

Of course that's a thing.

I'm... not sure that this should be a thing. The implication, I mean.

I mean: These are pretty penis-y:

post #1483723 post #1483712

but not so much these:

post #1301062 post #1361236 post #917564

I could argue this either way and I don't know how I feel.

What about snake_penis --> unusual_penis?

Maxpizzle said:
What about snake_penis --> unusual_penis?

I thought that was normal? Joke aside,+1

Maxpizzle said:
What about snake_penis --> unusual_penis?

Yeah, that's definitely an unusual_penis.

Hm..

wiki says: "Usually, this tag only refers to shape, not size. Thus, to be unusual enough, it typically has to hardly looks like a penis at all, and more like an independent lifeform or a lethal weapon (as so many penises subject to this tag have often been described as looking).

This tag implies the following tags: penis"

Of course, the tag seems a bit mistagged in general:

post #1480607 post #1435568 post #1426483

As I"m pretty sure "a penis, with an extra knobby bit or two' doesn't count.

That or every feline penis should... and.. and.. yeah.

Snake penis, like snake tail, should probably imply snake

SnowWolf said:
As I"m pretty sure "a penis, with an extra knobby bit or two' doesn't count.

Yep. And most of those seem to be mistagged by a single user, as usual.
Unusual_penis is for ones that are alien enough to be hard to recognize as a penis on the first look. Such as post #1419660, post #1356437, and post #1360815.

As such, snake_penis probably counts.