Implicating giant_anteater → anteater
Link to implication
Reason:
It's a subspecies of anteaters. Wiki already has this written but the implication is missing.
Updated by ImpidiDinkaDoo
Topic: Tag Implication: giant_anteater -> anteater
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
1nsane said:
Implicating giant_anteater → anteater
Link to implicationReason:
It's a subspecies of anteaters. Wiki already has this written but the implication is missing.
+1.
Tamandua (45 posts) also needs this implication, as it's also a species of anteater.
It'd be good if Silky anteater also got the implication, but as of now it's an empty tag so it's less priority.
Updated by anonymous
Bumping again.
Giant_anteater is near 100 posts, tamandua has a large chunk of posts, and silky_anteater has some content (there's even more, just not uploaded yet. there's at least a good chunk of silky anteater stuff to upload). Having them imply their base species of Anteater would be useful.
Like with most of my tag clean up project and tidying stuff, I've added pretty comprehensive wiki pages for the specific species themselves a long while ago. Only exception is silky_anteater, which had no content at the time that I made the other anteater pages. Will make a wiki page for it a little today perhaps, or another user may do so if they wish.
Also since it's related: my Pilosan tag suggestion thread, and its possible implication to anteaters and sloths.
Updated by anonymous