Implicating wild_dog → canine
Link to implication
Reason:
Seems intuitive - wild dogs are canines, so it should be tagged as well.
Updated by SnowWolf
Topic: Tag Implication: wild_dog -> canine
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
that should be a disambiguation. there is no such species as "wild dog". half of those are mistagged posts containing african wild dog and others are just vague canines
Updated by anonymous
Lord_Eggplant said:
that should be a disambiguation. there is no such species as "wild dog". half of those are mistagged posts containing african wild dog and others are just vague canines
Agreed:
The african_wild_dog is pretty distinctive.
There are some other 'legit' wild dogs like the indian wild dog (or Dhole), I"ve heard Dingos caleld 'wild dogs' before... technically, a Pariah dog is wild. (A pariah dog is basically... what happens when a group of free-range domestic dogs develop, as a group, a genetic identity that classifies them as a unique breed that could be wiped out by breeding with 'other' animals. -- this makes them different than a 'generic mutt' ... that said, for taggign purposes? we're not doing genetic analysis.
we're doing good if we can tell a coyote from a dingo from a yellow lab around here :P
Updated by anonymous