Silly question. How much bulge should be tagged explicit? I know that images tagged hyper should always be explicit but what about a character with just a minor bulge? should this still be explicit? or is it just questionable? What is range of questionable bulge to explicit bulge and where does the tipping point lie?

if you can basically see individual testicles and/or you can tell where the glans is, it probably should be explicit. i dont think that size affects on it all except for differentiating safe and questionable (barely noticeable bulge is safe and bigger bulges are questionable)

Lord_Eggplant said:
if you can basically see individual testicles and/or you can tell where the glans is, it probably should be explicit. i dont think that size affects on it all except for differentiating safe and questionable (barely noticeable bulge is safe and bigger bulges are questionable)

Yep; any post where shape can be defined in the 'bulge' would likely be covered under penis_outline and/or balls_outline, so would require rating:e

The moment the bulge becomes detailed enough you're able make out individual parts of the penis or scrotum they're almost always explicit.

Presumably a bulge large enough to qualify as hyper would also qualify as explicit, even if not drawn such that distinct features are distinguishable, no?