Implicating ejaculation → orgasm
Link to implication

Reason:

While it's possible to orgasm without ejaculating I'm pretty sure the opposite isn't. (inb4 science rant proving me wrong)

That's odd. I could've sworn that this was already implicated.
Maybe it got unimplicated... for some unexplained reason.

I'm actually not sure how the orgasm tag is being used.

If ejeculation implies orgasm, then are ejaculating dildos (with cum_tubes) considered orgasms? Or should they be not tagged with ejaculation at all?

TheGreatWolfgang said:
I'm actually not sure how the orgasm tag is being used.

If ejeculation implies orgasm, then are ejaculating dildos (with cum_tubes) considered orgasms? Or should they be not tagged with ejaculation at all?

That's a good point, but I feel it would be best to give that one its own tag.

TheGreatWolfgang said:
If ejeculation implies orgasm, then are ejaculating dildos (with cum_tubes) considered orgasms? Or should they be not tagged with ejaculation at all?

Since the dildo and penis tags are kept separate, 'real' and 'artificial' ejaculation should probably be separate too. But I'm not aware of any existing tag for the latter.

You can get ejaculation without orgasm through ruined orgasms (now tagged interrupted orgasms?), prostate milking, hypnosis, and electro-stimulation.

I'd change that claim to ejaculation+sex→ orgasm.

PolishOnion said:
I'd change that claim to ejaculation+sex→ orgasm.

you can't implicate multiple tags to something

PolishOnion said:
I'd change that claim to ejaculation+sex→ orgasm.

ejactulation+sex isn't a tag, and frankly, shouldn't be.
You can ejaculate and orgasm without having sex, too. An ejaculation is always an orgasm.