I noticed that there are some of galleries are mistagged, so I draw a line which I can clearly describe which penis types would use it better. This drawing below indicates that this red and green lines noted that these are retracted foreskin, orange is true circumcised penis. if any of three lines aren't listed would be quite questionable. (or folds in penis, also two tones that has sharp line which are separated, not gradual colour that indicate that it's grower uncut penis)

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/390452161479311360/526250686367662120/unknown.png

I've been told by knotty curls to post it here on forums after having DM'ed them in discord.

Circumcised has always been overtagged. If I had to guess, it's probably because many users from US don't have any idea of what an uncircumcised penis looks like.

well I'm one of few which I pointed out, so I contributed 200+ corrections from "circumcised" to "retracted_foreskin", and I often saw some penis lines in detail. I just explained to them by drawings which one is cut and which one is not.

Circumcised is truly overtagged, but there are some which is in wrong category (it was tagged as circumcised even if it's explicitly shown that it has retracted foreskin).

I have seen penises without any clear circumsision lines on it. Also ones where the pulled foreskin area is so small that you need magnification glass to properly see that it's there, making penis looking a lot like it had been circumcised.

I will admit that I have also been misstagging this more than couple times even with knowing how things should look like, but in general if someone is constantly doing tagging wrongly you can also report the user for that.

You can also link that example on the circumcised wiki page if you want to, visual representation is always better from written one.

Also goddamn I cannot write circumcised properly, have to rely on copy-pasting.

Mairo said:
You can also link that example on the circumcised wiki page if you want to, visual representation is always better from written one.

That might help.
At one point I tried looking for a good thumbs for the circumcised wiki, but couldn't find any that demonstrate it well. ...close-ups of humanoid penises are rarely site-relevant enough to be approved.

Genjar said:
That might help.
At one point I tried looking for a good thumbs for the circumcised wiki, but couldn't find any that demonstrate it well. ...close-ups of humanoid penises are rarely site-relevant enough to be approved.

that's the reason why I decided to draw myself, if you google search "grower uncut ****" you may notice that growers during erection might easily confuse for circumcised, don't forget that ridged band is always visible so it goes to "retracted_foreskin"