Topic: Tag Implication: clothed_male_nude_female -> clothed/nude

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Implicating clothed_male_nude_female → clothed/nude
Link to implication

Reason:

It's clothed/nude involving clothed male and nude female characters specifically

Related implications

Related aliases

Updated

okay imo these clothed X nude Y tags are really excessively complicated and specific. instead the tags could be broken down to simpler tags like clothed_female, nude_dickgirl, nude_male etc. the content would be still searchable, but like without all.. this

Updated by anonymous

siikaprinssi said:
okay imo these clothed X nude Y tags are really excessively complicated and specific. instead the tags could be broken down to simpler tags like clothed_female, nude_dickgirl, nude_male etc. the content would be still searchable, but like without all.. this

+1. I'd rather see 2 tags per gender (8*2 = 16) than 4 permutations per gender pair (8*8*4/2 = a lot more than 16!).

Updated by anonymous

siikaprinssi said:
okay imo these clothed X nude Y tags are really excessively complicated and specific. instead the tags could be broken down to simpler tags like clothed_female, nude_dickgirl, nude_male etc. the content would be still searchable, but like without all.. this

BlueDingo said:
+1. I'd rather see 2 tags per gender (8*2 = 16) than 4 permutations per gender pair (8*8*4/2 = a lot more than 16!).

Valid arguments honestly! And I can definitely see that being an option; its formatting would also match with similar tags like larger_female, too. Could definitely work!

In that case, the already existing implicated term clothed_female_nude_male should be aliased to the proper base tag, clothed_female

Updated by anonymous

  • 1