Since this site is owned by Bad Dragon, which is in Arizona, and thus adhere to Arizona laws, I'm curious on which tags are considered "safe" in one state or country, while it's "questionable" and "explicit" in another?

I still have certain a kind of muscle memory where I post and tag my artwork here from Furaffinity, where it's if I post shirtless characters with even a normal bulge, it would be "safe" there, but it's "questionable" here.

Pretty sure Arizona law doesn't play into the ratings system.. at all

As far as your examples go, it's the detail level of the speedo bulge as you can tell where the penis is, as well as the evident pubes which always bump up rating. And the one you changed the rating of your self would of been fine as safe..

Versperus said:
Pretty sure Arizona law doesn't play into the ratings system.. at all

As far as your examples go, it's the detail level of the speedo bulge as you can tell where the penis is, as well as the evident pubes which always bump up rating. And the one you changed the rating of your self would of been fine as safe..

On the latter: I seem to have added the "bulge" tag, even though it's not detailed. I mean, adding the "bulge" tag makes it to "questionable" territory, right?

AlexYorim said:
On the latter: I seem to have added the "bulge" tag, even though it's not detailed. I mean, adding the "bulge" tag makes it to "questionable" territory, right?

Everything hinges on detail level, something simply having a bulge doesn't automatically make it questionable, a simple evidence of phallus or something in the pants under clothing is fine as save, but once you start moving up the later of detail it gets to questionable when you can start to identify where the penis is, and than from that point it's a line of possibly explicit with how effective the clothing is at actually hiding anything. Example with how penis outlines are always explicit.

It's the same concept with camel toes, very faint camel toe can be rated s, the more obvious are q, than the ones that don't hide anything are e

Versperus said:
Everything hinges on detail level, something simply having a bulge doesn't automatically make it questionable, a simple evidence of phallus or something in the pants under clothing is fine as save, but once you start moving up the later of detail it gets to questionable when you can start to identify where the penis is, and than from that point it's a line of possibly explicit with how effective the clothing is at actually hiding anything. Example with how penis outlines are always explicit.

It's the same concept with camel toes, very faint camel toe can be rated s, the more obvious are q, than the ones that don't hide anything are e

Thanks a bunch! I must take a close inspection on the picture on what I should tag.

----

Now back to the first question. What do you think is considered safe in Arizona while it's raunchy in other states?

'This state contains nsfw content. You must be 18 or older to cross the border'

'This toilet queue contains omorashi which is in your blacklist. Do you wish to stand here anyway?'