Implicating big_thighs → thick_thighs

misspelled it the first time, big dumb
Link to implication

tried a second time but got shot down by the system I think
Link to implication

Reason:

big_thighs seems to be bugged somehow with aliasing. the tag has no history of being aliased to another tag however aliasing suggestions are not allowed based on that assumption. if possible aliasing big_thighs to the much more used tag thick_thighs seems very appropriate based on usage. if this is not possible for some reason an implication between the two would probably be the next best thing

original had a spelling error in a tag, it created the forum post so eh. it appears this implication has already been made(I got an error message at least). not sure if it's possible but imo it would probably be appropriate to reclass the relationship between these two tags as an alias instead of an implication. too close in meaning

if not could someone edit/tell me how to edit the tag descriptions for big_thighs and thick_thighs to include the implication please? the info is missing but I can't find instructions on how to add it. well add it the way it's supposed to appear in the alias/implication box. bugged descriptions? ... nope, there are recent posts tagged with big_thighs that aren't tagged with thick_thighs. pretty sure I got an error message when i actually spelled the two tags right telling me the implication was already made... will wait for a while to see if the implication requests do anything then maybe make a bug forum post asking about it

Thank you whoever fixed this :)

Uh, now the misspelled tag "thigk_thighs" has been added to the implication chain and has close to 4000 tagged images. It's kinda funny but might not be a good thing to leave as is...

sneezer22 said:
Uh, now the misspelled tag "thigk_thighs" has been added to the implication chain and has close to 4000 tagged images. It's kinda funny but might not be a good thing to leave as is...

Fixed!

What happened is I approved your suggestion, but your suggestion had a typo, so the system implemented the new implication with said typo

I've temporarily aliased thigk_thighs to thick_thighs in the meantime to fix the issue. Shouldn't take too long

Thank You Dice :)