Implicating orgasm_face → orgasm
Link to implication

Reason:

hard to have an o-face without the o, otherwise it's just a face

...character can make an orgasm face for example while eating really good food

-1
There's not necessarily any kind of indication of orgasm while character does have orgasm face.

If there's no orgasm then it's just a weird face tho. Can we just tag any weird face with it then? If the character is enjoying themselves, eating food in an orgasmic way for example, imo it would be closer to looking_pleasured, ex. making a look of pleasure tied to being sexually stimulated by eating food. If there doesn't have to be an indication of orgasm and the face can be anything it's a kind of a pointless tag... My def. would be "a weird face someone makes while orgasming" since it can kinda be any face that's out of the norm by my understanding. That def. would warrant this implication.

okay in that case the whole orgasm face tag should be aliased away to looking_pleasured

What if it's not a pleasurable orgasm face though? It could be a painful orgasm face that might happen with overstimulation or forced_orgasm. I could get on board with aliasing it if that's for the best but that doesn't quite fit this situation as well as I'd like it to

Wow, Abadbird came in and cleaned house on the description page after I touched it up a bit 0.0

literally nobody uses orgasm face tag for characters that have pained expression. orgasm face means having pleasured expression.

I could be ok with it going either way but personally I'd prefer if it became its own thing and then maybe have it imply looking_pleasured if that's the only way people use it

Also that's pretty much the reason I requested this implication in the first place, having it be linked to orgasm would be another way of differentiating it from looking_pleasured which can be more of a stand alone tag that can apply to just a headshot with no context