At least, considering images like this are present to prove that yes, it absolutely is possible for an image to have a previously-severed head in it without any active decapitation taking place.
Updated by PheagleAdler
Posted under General
At least, considering images like this are present to prove that yes, it absolutely is possible for an image to have a previously-severed head in it without any active decapitation taking place.
Updated by PheagleAdler
Updated by anonymous
Ratte said:
severed_head ≠ disembodied_head
No, no. On the wall behind the...fox?...doing potions. Next to the lantern. With a feather dangling off of it.
Updated by anonymous
Jacob said:
No, no. On the wall behind the...fox?...doing potions. Next to the lantern. With a feather dangling off of it.
Can't have a severed head without first applying decapitation.
Updated by anonymous
Jacob said:
No, no. On the wall behind the...fox?...doing potions. Next to the lantern. With a feather dangling off of it.
Yes, I know what you're referring to. Please look at the wiki for disembodied_head.
Updated by anonymous
Ah. So, basically, you're saying the pic was just tagged wrong. Gotcha'.
Updated by anonymous
Nearly-Headless Nick?
Updated by anonymous