Wikis: bisexual_sandwich | sandwich_position | train_position

bisexual_sandwich currently implies sandwich_position.
As a result, many posts with the bisexual_sandwich tag are incorrectly tagged as sandwich_position, when they should be tagged train_position.
The main difference between sandwich_position and train_position is the direction that the bottom character is facing.

I think the problem lies in the faulty description of bisexual_sandwich. The description should mention that the top and bottom are always facing each other, but it currently does not.

Delian said:
I think the problem lies in the faulty description of bisexual_sandwich. The description should mention that the top and bottom are always facing each other, but it currently does not.

If that's the case, then the description should be changed. But I have always seen bisexual_sandwich used (and used it myself) to mean: a male or female character in a sexual situation with two other characters, one male and one female, regardless of position.

SaimonPSmith said:But I have always seen bisexual_sandwich used (and used it myself) to mean: a male or female character in a sexual situation with two other characters, one male and one female, regardless of position.

That's just bisexual.

So, is there really any reason to have bisexual_sandwich, when you could just search bisexual sandwich_position?

I think the spirit of bisexual_sandwich is as the wiki and SaimonPSmith says: it's more about the act than the specific position it happens in. It's just unfortunate naming that bisexual_sandwich and sandwich_position share a word, because although a bisexual_sandwich can occur in the sandwich_position, it does have to. Perhaps it should be renamed, but I can't think of a better term. Without a tag like it though, the best search we could do would be (anal_penetration vaginal_penetration group bisexual), which leaves 2 tags to search with for most users.

+1 to deimplication at the least

rezi said:
I think the spirit of bisexual_sandwich is as the wiki and SaimonPSmith says: it's more about the act than the specific position it happens in.

That seems redundant: searching for various combos such as bisexual group_sex, bisexual double_penetration or bisexual gangbang gets the same results. At least as far as I can see.

Genjar said:
That seems redundant: searching for various combos such as bisexual group_sex, bisexual double_penetration or bisexual gangbang gets the same results. At least as far as I can see.

It has a strong overlap, but it doesn't get the same results all the time, like in post #736911, post #727919, or post #1001869. Maybe a tag like "penetrating_while_penetrated", in this case for MMF, is the core act I'm trying to describe.

Bumping for clarification. I also noticed it odd that posts like post #693269 would be tagged with sandwich position if one of the participants were female.