Implicating eeveelution → pokémon
Link to implication

Reason:

Eeveelution refers to any of the evolutions of Eevee, which are all Pokémon.

Don't all the eeveeloutions already imply pokemon?
Seems extraneous.

Edit: Checked, they all do.

Recommend nuking the tag. If you want eevee evolutions, search for the names. Make it a pool if you want it that bad.

123easy said:
Recommend nuking the tag. If you want eevee evolutions, search for the names. Make it a pool if you want it that bad.

I think that discussion was already made before...

Butterscotch said:
I think that discussion was already made before...

It was, Admin ruling was to keep it.
Still doesn't need the pokemon implication though.

123easy said:
Recommend nuking the tag. If you want eevee evolutions, search for the names. Make it a pool if you want it that bad.

6 tag limit, looking for 9 creatures plus extra tags.

GENIUS! :P

CamKitty said:
6 tag limit, looking for 9 creatures plus extra tags.

GENIUS! :P

Then... Should we also add tags for starter pokemon, humanshape pokemon, fire pokemon, legendary pokemon, etc? Because there are some users who would find those useful.

...oh wait, legendary_pokemon already is a tag. But what about the rest?

Genjar said:
Then... Should we also add tags for starter pokemon, humanshape pokemon, fire pokemon, legendary pokemon, etc? Because there are some users who would find those useful.

...oh wait, legendary_pokemon already is a tag. But what about the rest?

Let's add even more tags, like repeated_pokemon for pokemons that are lame almost exact copy of pokemons from previous generations, like sealeo. Or what_were_they_thinking_pokemon for pokemons like klefki. Or hideous_pokemon for binacle.

Gilda_The_Gryphon said:
Let's add even more tags, like repeated_pokemon for pokemons that are lame almost exact copy of pokemons from previous generations, like sealeo. Or what_were_they_thinking_pokemon for pokemons like klefki. Or hideous_pokemon for binacle.

That sounds personal :(

Anyways, if "cutie mark crusaders (mlp)" is a tag, this is no different. Yay selective annoyance at silly tags :o

CamKitty said:
That sounds personal :(

Anyways, if "cutie mark crusaders (mlp)" is a tag, this is no different. Yay selective annoyance at silly tags :o

I was for aliasing it away, and it wasn't done only because of typo. Other stupid mlp tags like mane_six, or other that I don't want to remember are deleted. In many cases by my suggestion.

And I don't see why hideous_pokemon is more personal that eeveelutions, or pokemon_starting_with_letter_b.

P.S.
I think I have the best idea ever! Implicate zubat, geodude, tentacool, etc. to repel. So if you add repel to your blacklist they will disappear! :D

CamKitty said:
6 tag limit, looking for 9 creatures plus extra tags.

GENIUS! :P

I thought that's what pools were for?

123easy said:
I thought that's what pools were for?

No, it's not.
You could do a set of "eevee evolutions", but a pool wouldn't be good.

Halite said:
No, it's not.
You could do a set of "eevee evolutions", but a pool wouldn't be good.

As noted in the other thread, the first line in the pools help document states that pools are meant for a group of posts that have a common theme. That sounds to me like EXACTLY what a pool is for. In fact, pools even have a specific function to do a tag search and add them all to a pool at once, so you could do a search for each Eevee evolution and add them to the pool wholesale, instead of having to do it manually. So how is that bad?

123easy said:
As noted in the other thread, the first line in the pools help document states that pools are meant for a group of posts that have a common theme. That sounds to me like EXACTLY what a pool is for. In fact, pools even have a specific function to do a tag search and add them all to a pool at once, so you could do a search for each Eevee evolution and add them to the pool wholesale, instead of having to do it manually. So how is that bad?

How about we keep the discussion in one thread?

Granberia said:
P.S.
I think I have the best idea ever! Implicate zubat, geodude, tentacool, etc. to repel. So if you add repel to your blacklist they will disappear! :D

That's genius! Not sure how many people would use it, but it would be fun to have anyway!

RubyRiolu said:
That's genius! Not sure how many people would use it, but it would be fun to have anyway!

was it absolutely necessary to necro a 5 years old thread only to respond to a joke suggestion