Topic: Tag Alias: immobilization -> fully_bound

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

Ok. That seems accurate -- one involves conventional bondage equipment and the other doesn't. In that case the wiki is definitely incorrect.

Updated by anonymous

It seems pretty similar to restrained.

I'd say that to differentiate them, restrained can sometimes allow movement but never leaving the current spot (which would defeat the tag), whereas immobilization can mean absolutely no movement, which would then have an implication of immobilizationrestrained.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

There's currently major overlap in restrained and bound. That should probably be sorted out first before trying to figure out the best way to handle immobilization/immobilized and other related tags.

I propose that we separate the usage of the base tags:
- bound when the character is bound/held by objects and other non-living things (ropes, bondage, etc). All the current implications seem to work fine with this usage.
- restrained when the character is restrained/held by an another character (including coiling etc), or a tentacle.

It'd require clean-up, but would be a relatively easy project. (Combo search for restrained bondage solo, etc.)

Updated by anonymous

This was just discussed in Discord #tag-discussions, and an agreement was found, like Genjar proposes here. I agree with it, and am planning on working with the wiki pages towards this target.

This also coincides with my project on clinging tag to be used when a character is self supporting their own lifted, hanging, suspension, etc. A character may hang themselves on a branch with a rope, after which they are only _hanging_ by non-living object, not clinging with their own activity any more.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1