The tag implication #31908 reverse_bunny_costume -> costume has been approved.

Reason: Self-explanatory, it is a costume.

Additionally, without making a separate request: Should reverse_bunny_costume implicate bunny_costume?
Also, an alias for reverse_bunny_suit to reverse_bunny_costume might be a good idea (had to clean up the former tag just a moment ago). The "suit" tag did not have 50 posts, so I could not make an alias request

EDIT: The tag implication reverse_bunny_costume -> costume (forum #289212) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

Oversimplification can be harmful.

Reverse Bunny suits/costumes are different from Normal Bunny Suits/Costumes, and these two are completely different from many other Costumes.

Costumes is a Hyperonym (the greater group), and then everything things is linked straight to it, but, not everything inside the Greater Group is exactly the same.

That will only create confusion.

ragnarokstravius said:
Oversimplification can be harmful.

Reverse Bunny suits/costumes are different from Normal Bunny Suits/Costumes, and these two are completely different from many other Costumes.

Costumes is a Hyperonym (the greater group), and then everything things is linked straight to it, but, not everything inside the Greater Group is exactly the same.

That will only create confusion.

He's asking for an implication, not an alias. And a reverse bunny costume would certainly qualify as a costume. The first suggestion makes sense to me.

Not so sure on the second one, though. You're right that the two types of bunny costumes (reverse and normal) are quite different...

jacob said:
He's asking for an implication, not an alias. And a reverse bunny costume would certainly qualify as a costume. The first suggestion makes sense to me.

I'm still new to the Alias/Implication system, sorry for that.

The tag implication reverse_bunny_costume -> costume (forum #289212) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.