The tag implication #31943 foreskin_pull -> foreskin has been rejected.

Reason: It's more or less in the tags.

EDIT: The tag implication foreskin_pull -> foreskin (forum #289640) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Yes this would be lovely but as I have brought up Multiple times now

https://e621.net/forum_topics/24683
https://e621.net/forum_topics/24496

All of the foreskin related tags need to be fixed.

The tag implication foreskin_pull -> foreskin (forum #289640) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Reason: Implication stuck as "processing".
Re-created in implication #42887.