The tag implication #32029 magic_wand -> wand has been rejected.
Reason: Same object.
EDIT: The tag implication magic_wand -> wand (forum #290722) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under General
The tag implication #32029 magic_wand -> wand has been rejected.
Reason: Same object.
EDIT: The tag implication magic_wand -> wand (forum #290722) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
rollingpussbob said:
Reason: Same object.
That reason suggests you want an alias, not an implication?
furrin_gok said:
That reason suggests you want an alias, not an implication?
I really dont know how to describe these things. Shouldnt magic_wand imply wand?
Are there any other kind of wands under the wand tag...? Wiki seems indicate that it's for magic wands, so maybe an alias instead.
(Wand vibrators are probably best kept under a separate tag. Mixing those into umbrella doesn't seem useful for searchability.)
Updated
genjar said:
Are there any other kind of wands under the wand tag...? Wiki seems indicate that it's for magic wands, so maybe an alias instead.(Wand vibrators are probably best kept under a separate tag. Mixing those into umbrella doesn't seem useful for searchability.)
Vibrating wands are called "hitachi magic wands".
The tag implication magic_wand -> wand (forum #290722) has been rejected by @Millcore.