The tag implication #32038 pattern_clothing -> clothing has been rejected.

Reason: Well, these are clothing, with colorful different patterns (stripes, spots, etc.)...

EDIT: The tag implication pattern_clothing -> clothing (forum #290769) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

EDIT: The tag implication pattern_clothing -> clothing (forum #290769) has been rejected by @KiraNoot.

Makes sense to me!

The tag implication pattern_clothing -> clothing (forum #290769) has been approved by @Rainbow_Dash.

The tag implication pattern_clothing -> clothing (forum #290769) has been rejected by @KiraNoot.

Before anyone wonders why: this has been implicated since 2017.
This got double-implicated, so the newer one was deleted.

genjar said:
Before anyone wonders why: this has been implicated since 2017.
This got double-implicated, so the newer one was deleted.

I'm going through and cleaning up a bunch of duplicate implications. Some nonsensical code was in place that allowed duplicates to be easily created. This and string_bikini were just stuck as "processing" as a result of being duplicates, so I used the UI to delete them.