Posted under General
The tag implication #32080 bee_humanoid -> bee has been rejected.
Reason: To make it consistent with other humanoid tags implicating in main species tag.
EDIT: The tag implication bee_humanoid -> bee (forum #291325) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
+1, and several other arthropod_humanoid tags that are missing an implication to their prefix.
cat_humanoid doesn't imply domestic_cat, but it does imply feline_humanoid and feline. bee_humanoid implies hymenopteran_humanoid and hymenopteran, so if anything, this is introducing an inconsistency.
Updated
lafcadio said:
cat_humanoid doesn't imply domestic_cat, but it does imply feline_humanoid and feline. bee_humanoid implies hymenopteran_humanoid and hymenopteran, so if anything, this is introducing an inconsistency.
I had thought of cat_humanoid as an exception or a missing implication rather than the rule for animal_humanoid tags, as several other similar arthropod_humanoid tags do have such an implication (mantis_humanoid, cockroach_humanoid, shrimp_humanoid, hermit_crab_humanoid).
However, looking through the various animal_humanoid tags I'm starting to see that most animal_humanoid tags don't have these kinds of implications (with the exception of fictional species like western_dragon_humanoid and gryphon_humanoid). I'm wondering if there's a practical reason (such as search problems) for not using these kinds of implications, since they seem like they would be useful for accurately tagging and searching for posts.
The tag implication bee_humanoid -> bee (forum #291325) has been rejected by @Millcore.
