The bulk update request #201 is active.

remove implication imminent_vore (6275) -> vore (63438)

Reason: The whole point of "imminent_[thing]" tags, is that the thing is not yet happening. And you're only supposed to tag that thing if it's currently happening. I mean, if you're gonna' implicate imminent_vore to vore, you might as well implicate imminent_sex to sex, and such like.

EDIT: The bulk update request #201 (forum #294806) has been approved by @Millcore.

could've gone with "imminent de-implication"

strikerman said:
could've gone with "imminent de-implication"

I suppose I could've, at that.

I assumed this was intentional since vore is a fetish tag. The term "voreaphilia" is aliased to the vore tag and that term would include most things vore related including imminent_vore.

thevileone said:
I assumed this was intentional since vore is a fetish tag. The term "voreaphilia" is aliased to the vore tag and that term would include most things vore related including imminent_vore.

vore is supposed to be the act of vore'ing. voraraphilia was aliased to vore, rather than vore being aliased to vorarephilia. It doesn't seem as though -philias are really tagged, preferring to tag specific acts that you can see happening (zoophilia -> bestiality, somnophilia -> sleep_sex, etc), rather than general themes that may be subjectively inferred (does this picture on its own deserve to be tagged vorarephilia? Or this picture? someone thought so, but I would bet some could reasonably disagree).

thevileone said:
I assumed this was intentional since vore is a fetish tag. The term "voreaphilia" is aliased to the vore tag and that term would include most things vore related including imminent_vore.

The kink tags are for when the kink is ACTIVELY HAPPENING RIGHT NOW. The entire point of the "imminent_[kink]" tags is supposed to be that the kink is not happening, yet, but the image heavily implies it is going to, soon. Y'know, like I already said in my opening post.

There's also the problem of how vore is always supposed to be rated Q+, but imminent vore does not always warrant a Q (if it's not being depicted in fetishistic manner). vore rating:s remains impossible to clean up while this implication remains.

It makes sense to remove the implication IMO. By all means do so.

The bulk update request #201 (forum #294806) has been approved by @Millcore.