I tried using order:desclenght but A. It doesn't show up as a recommendation for "order:" B. it doesn't actually order the posts

Is it currently broken or does it just not work on mobile

fghwe444 said:
I tried using order:desclenght but A. It doesn't show up as a recommendation for "order:" B. it doesn't actually order the posts

Is it currently broken or does it just not work on mobile

From what I can see, it should probably be order:length_desc as that seems to be the format shown on some of the suggestions after typing order:. However, it appears that length, width, and height are not currently valid options for order:. I can't be much more help as I don't really use the sorting options.

riverinadryland said:
From what I can see, it should probably be order:length_desc as that seems to be the format shown on some of the suggestions after typing order:. However, it appears that length, width, and height are not currently valid options for order:. I can't be much more help as I don't really use the sorting options.

You are mistaken.
The term in question here is desclength - as in, description length - as stated in the cheatsheet.
And it is not working. In fact, it does not seem to be present in the source code altogether.
It's possible that it was simply phased out at some point, and the cheatsheet ws never updated.

The order options for image length and width are order:portrait and order:landscape.

I thought the issue was gonna be that there's a misspelling, "length" rather than "lenght".