Topic: Tag Implication: thick_penis -> penis

Posted under General

Man we have a lot of tags that have the word penis in it.

Why haven't we had any viscous arguments about penis size tagging like we do breasts?

whats the difference between huge_penis thick_penis and big_penis?

i'll also toss long_penis and hyper_penis out there too.

man we have a lot of tags that have 'penis' in them.

Penis doens't even look like a word anymore...

Updated by anonymous

The number of penis related tags does not compare with the number of cum related tags. cum is just too plain. Why use the boring three-letter tag when you can be more specific?

Maybe you're a capitalist who likes cum_on_money? Perhaps you're a handyman--you might want to see cum_on_gloves.

What's the difference between cum_everywhere and cum_pretty_much_everywhere? Does it matter?

Then there are some of the more puzzling tags. cum_in_self? molotov_cumtail? cum_through_ears? If there's anything furries like more than penises, it's semen.

(Of course, I can't ignore that a search for "*cum*" in tags also brings up stop_right_there_criminal_scum, but that is neither here nor there.)

Updated by anonymous

SnowWolf said:
Man we have a lot of tags that have the word penis in it.

Why haven't we had any viscous arguments about penis size tagging like we do breasts?

whats the difference between huge_penis thick_penis and big_penis?

i'll also toss long_penis and hyper_penis out there too.

man we have a lot of tags that have 'penis' in them.

Penis doens't even look like a word anymore...

It'd be the best for thick penis, big penis and huge penis to be aliased, as they're all essentially the same thing. I'm actually surprised these haven't been aliased before.

But I don't think long penis should. I would think a long penis would obviously be long, but lack in girth unlike a usual huge penis. Like this.
post #35576

Hyper penis? Well, that's certainly different.
post #232015

Updated by anonymous

zellan said:
The number of penis related tags does not compare with the number of cum related tags. cum is just too plain. Why use the boring three-letter tag when you can be more specific?

Maybe you're a capitalist who likes cum_on_money? Perhaps you're a handyman--you might want to see cum_on_gloves.

Well, those at least are relevant ideas XD I can't ever envision searching them myself, except for laughs. but hey.

What's the difference between cum_everywhere and cum_pretty_much_everywhere? Does it matter?

One is a tag.. the other is someone being funny :p

[quote[Then there are some of the more puzzling tags. cum_in_self? molotov_cumtail? cum_through_ears? If there's anything furries like more than penises, it's semen.[/quote]

again, some of those are jsut 'silly' tags.

most of the cum related tags are pretty relevant... the questiosn rising up between 'similar' tags like cum_covered and cum_everywhere and cum_in_mouth and cum_on_tongue, cum_in_cleavage and cum_on_chest, cum on stomach and cum_on_abs most of which are subtley different.

but, cum andi t's tags belong in a differnet thread XD

720p said:
It'd be the best for thick penis, big penis and huge penis to be aliased, as they're all essentially the same thing. I'm actually surprised these haven't been aliased before.

this was my semi-point actually. :) they are all pretty much similar sorts of ideas.

But I don't think long penis should. I would think a long penis would obviously be long, but lack in girth unlike a usual huge penis. Like this.

Hyper penis? Well, that's certainly different.

Oh yes. I was more being conversational about them then anything else.
though I'd say that long penis is also a thick one. but.

Updated by anonymous

Big_penis = larger than average
Huge_penis = larger than naturally possible
Hyper_penis = wtf that's too big

Thick would be an uncommonly thick penis for it's length.
Long would be an uncommonly long penis for it's thickness.

All separate things if tagged correctly.

Updated by anonymous

Hammie said:
Big_penis = larger than average
Huge_penis = larger than naturally possible
Hyper_penis = wtf that's too big

Thick would be an uncommonly thick penis for it's length.
Long would be an uncommonly long penis for it's thickness.

All separate things if tagged correctly.

the thing is.. it's also subjective. Are we looking at the size of the penis compared to the rest of the owner? of the penis compared to the person it's going into? of the penis compared to other penises in the picture? are we going to say "well, for a cat, that is a big penis" or "for a horse, that penis is pretty small"?

problem is.. what's average? most furries are pretty well endowed in general. I mean. male and females alike. Just, while some guys enjoy small breasts, in general, the vast majority of people don't have 'tiny penis' fetishes...

Everyone is going to look at a penis and have a different word for it's size.

I dunno.

I really kind of feel like big and huge should be aliased together, and generally used for particularly hefty examples of masculinity.

Hyper penis, of course, is a whole separate ballgame.

Thick and long, though... I guess I can deal with those being separate. the question is are all thick penises also big? are all long penises big? (as in, should thick/long imply big (assuming big/huge/whatever are made to be a single tag)

Updated by anonymous

I would say that long or thick don't have to mean big, but I doubt that smaller examples of a long or thick penis would end up with the tags just because of the way people tend to tag.

Updated by anonymous

Hammie said:
I would say that long or thick don't have to mean big, but I doubt that smaller examples of a long or thick penis would end up with the tags just because of the way people tend to tag.

well, 'big' means significant in size. 'long' suggests that it is significantly long, thick means it's significantly thick. Presumably....

But then, I guess a penis could be long and thin.... hm. but big does't say anything about width... or length. or does it?

Updated by anonymous

KiwiPotato said:
thick =/= long, in fact, they're probably opposites. =/

If an evil fairy walked up to you and gave you the choice between a short but thick penis vs. a long but thin one, which would you choose?

Updated by anonymous

Munkelzahn said:
If an evil fairy walked up to you and gave you the choice between a short but thick penis vs. a long but thin one, which would you choose?

I've heard this one before, the right answer is taking a third option but saying "I'm happy with the one I have"

Updated by anonymous

SnowWolf said:
pictures

What is your point?

Munkelzahn said:
If an evil fairy walked up to you and gave you the choice between a short but thick penis vs. a long but thin one, which would you choose?

Neither, everyone know's fairies are weak so I'd punch in in the face and disembowel him.

Updated by anonymous

KiwiPotato said:
What is your point?

....that they're not at all opposites? I would argue that each of those are both thick and long, and thus, not opposites.

Updated by anonymous

Hammie said:
I would only call the last one thick...

And this is the crux of the problem isn't it? :) Everyone has their own opinion of what big/thick/long is. :)

anyway, ther'es obviously disagreement, so we'll scrap those implications...

but.. let me see...

big_penis implies penis
thick_penis implies penis
long_penis implies penis

is that right?

or shoudl we favor huge penis over big penis? hmmm..

and MAN this has a lot of redundant and occasionally odd tags. *adds to 'to clean up' list.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1