The tag implication #34195 orgasm_from_oral -> hands-free has been approved.

Reason: The wiki page for orgasm_from_oral specifically mentions that it has to be a hands-free orgasm.

EDIT: The tag implication orgasm_from_oral -> hands-free (forum #296677) has been approved by @Millcore.

We might want to rename the tag to hands-free_from_oral for clarity on who is orgasming (the giver, not the receiver). At any rate, it seems people are tagging it correctly with few exceptions, so it definitely should imply hands-free.

I propose cleaning up the few mistags, aliasing orgasm_from_oral -> hands-free_from_oral, then implicating hands-free_from_oral -> hands-free and hands-free_from_oral -> oral.

crocogator said:
Renaming the tag to hands-free_from_oral for clarity might be worth considering. At any rate, it seems people are tagging it correctly with few exceptions, so it definitely should imply hands-free.

EDIT: I propose cleaning up the few mistags, aliasing orgasm_from_oral -> hands-free_from_oral, then implicating hands-free_from_oral -> hands-free and hands-free_from_oral -> oral.

I think it's well enough implied from the tag's wording of orgasm_from_ rather than orgasm_during_. If someone is getting stimulation while giving oral, such as from masturbation, a hand-job, or penetrating another character, there's nothing to say the orgasm was from oral specifically. In contrast, hands-free_from_oral is kind of confusing and only makes sense when you know what the hands-free tag is (which I think should be aliased/renamed to hands-free_orgasm for clarity). Since people seem to be using orgasm_from_ tags correctly for the most part, I don't think those need to change.

watsit said:
I think it's well enough implied from the tag's wording of orgasm_from_ rather than orgasm_during_. If someone is getting stimulation while giving oral, such as from masturbation, a hand-job, or penetrating another character, there's nothing to say the orgasm was from oral specifically. In contrast, hands-free_from_oral is kind of confusing and only makes sense when you know what the hands-free tag is (which I think should be aliased/renamed to hands-free_orgasm for clarity). Since people seem to be using orgasm_from_ tags correctly for the most part, I don't think those need to change.

The problem is the tagger may think orgasm_from_oral means the receiver orgasms, when it should be the giver. I explained this in an edit a few seconds after you commented. Also, earlier I said the tag was generally tagged correctly... Yeah, I don't know what I was thinking. I just went through much of orgasm_from_oral -hands-free and removed orgasm_from_oral from 50 posts. There's currently 73 remaining posts to look through.

-------------
post #2023746 post #2450175 I guess this is more a question about tagging orgasm in general, but... Do these count as depicting orgasms? Without a cumshot shown, it seems it may be the aftermath of an orgasm instead?

crocogator said:
The problem is the tagger may think orgasm_from_oral means the receiver orgasms, when it should be the giver.

If a new name is desired to reduce confusion, so be it. But I think hands-free_from_oral looks very awkward since "hands-free" is an adverb, and doesn't flow into a word like "from". For this site, "hands-free" is shorthand for "hands-free orgasm", but having hands-free_from_* just reads poorly.

crocogator said:
post #2023746 post #2450175 I guess this is more a question about tagging orgasm in general, but... Do these count as depicting orgasms? Without a cumshot shown, it seems it may be the aftermath of an orgasm instead?

Looks recent enough to count, I'd say. They're still hard and dripping, and could just as well still be in the midst of an orgasm.

watsit said:
If a new name is desired to reduce confusion, so be it. But I think hands-free_from_oral looks very awkward since "hands-free" is an adverb, and doesn't flow into a word like "from". For this site, "hands-free" is shorthand for "hands-free orgasm", but having hands-free_from_* just reads poorly.

A tag that is mistagged at least ~15% 19% of the time isn't great, especially when most those mistags root from the confusing tag name, but I'm not sure if there's a great way to rename it. We could keep the name as is if needed.

watsit said:
Looks recent enough to count, I'd say. They're still hard and dripping, and could just as well still be in the midst of an orgasm.

Ok, thanks. I guess it follows hands-free applies too then? I added the tag to those two posts.

The tag implication orgasm_from_oral -> hands-free (forum #296677) has been approved by @Millcore.