The bulk update request #408 is active.

create alias older_penetrating (0) -> younger_penetrated (13502)
create implication younger_penetrated (13502) -> age_difference (69018)
create implication younger_penetrated (13502) -> penetration (799997)
create alias younger_penetrating_older (0) -> older_penetrated (5265)
create alias younger_penetrating (0) -> older_penetrated (5265)
create implication older_penetrated (5265) -> age_difference (69018)
create implication older_penetrated (5265) -> penetration (799997)

Reason: Giving attention to older_* and younger_* penetration tags...

I'm not sure if the tags should follow the smaller_penetrated and larger_penetrated tags, so I need feedback.

EDIT: The bulk update request #408 (forum #299926) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias older_penetrating_younger -> younger_penetrated)

EDIT: The bulk update request #408 (forum #299926) has been approved by @Millcore.

Makes sense to me. A younger character being penetrated implicitly means an older character is penetrating, so there's no need to have both younger_penetrated and older_penetrating, and older_penetrating_younger has redundancy.

There seems to be a problem with the first line of the script. Does anyone know how those error messages work?

🤔？ : Hmm...,
older_penetrating_younger(older_penetrating) vs. younger_penetrated
larger_penetrating vs. smaller_penetrated...

- If I see "younger" / "smaller" , it highlights there're younger / smaller character
- And If "older" / "larger", it also highlights there're older / larger one....

Needless to say, @Watsit is right of course, though....

gloomy_wing said:
🤔？ : Hmm...,

I see you're new to my weird naming of forum topics...

By the way, it's possible to have a younger, larger character and an older, smaller character. And I'm reffering to the naming: should the tag name be shortened (aliased) to younger_penetrated instead of older_penetrating_younger, just like smaller_penetrating_larger being aliased to larger_penetrated?

Also, don't bother with the "vs." thing, it's just a random movie title reference.

monsterbomb10010 said:...my weird naming of forum topics...

Is that really so? I think it's Very Good naming because it seem to be saying "Either one is not right, so Let's have a fight discuss and see which one is right".
In fact, I didn't think only one was right either until see your reply.
～～～～～～～～～～
Oh yeah, I remember that "younger+larger" and "older+smaller" are possible. It's the fiction.
And you were talking about shortend, Then there's no problem : 👍＋1

...I completely thought that, in age_difference ,
you were talking about cases where one of the characters is extremely Young or Old (than others), Or if we need to separate from that case and not. ( However that's nonsense because there are TWYS problems... )

The bulk update request #408 (forum #299926) has failed: Error: Alias would modify other aliases or implications through transitive relationships. (create alias older_penetrating_younger -> younger_penetrated)

Removed alias older_penetrating_younger -> younger_penetrated so that the BUR can be approved.

The bulk update request #408 (forum #299926) has been approved by @Millcore.