Right now, the wiki page for hairy_balls says not only hairy balls (as in humanoid pubic hair) should be tagged with that tag, but balls with fur should be tagged with it too.
I feel that's unfortunate, as pubic hair and fur are different. I like both, but I'd expect hairy_balls to usually be on humans and not on anthros.
However, the pre-existing tags furry_balls, fuzzy_balls, and fluffy_balls have unclear boundaries. Should two of those be aliased to one of those? Or should they stay separate but with more clear usages mentioned on their wiki pages?

After having a look at all three of the tags you have requested an implication for there are very few posts tagged as such.

I feel that it may be a better to have a distinction between "furry balls" and "pubic hair on balls" but I think two blanket tags would be the best option over having several variants of implications.

For example:

These are balls with pubic hair:

post #2555810

and these are furry balls:

post #2510862

Something like that?

dragonfox69 said:
After having a look at all three of the tags you have requested an implication for there are very few posts tagged as such.

I feel that it may be a better to have a distinction between "furry balls" and "pubic hair on balls" but I think two blanket tags would be the best option over having several variants of implications.

For example:

These are balls with pubic hair:

post #2555810

and these are furry balls:

post #2510862

Something like that?

Yep! I agree with this 100%.