Topic: Big, huge, hyper distinction for bellies [BUR]

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #994 is active.

remove alias huge_belly (21677) -> hyper_belly (14654)

Reason: There's a distinction between big, huge, and hyper for breasts, butts, balls, etc. and it would be useful to have for bellies too

EDIT: The bulk update request #994 (forum #311599) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

Also gonna do
implicate hyper_belly -> huge_belly
implicate huge_belly -> big_belly
But huge_belly needs to be unaliased first cause it errors out if i post it all on one script

Personally I have no idea where the line would be drawn, but that's probably true for a lot of the huge/hyper tags with other users, it's easy enough to just tag lightly and somebody else can tag further if it qualifies.

furrin_gok said:
Personally I have no idea where the line would be drawn, but that's probably true for a lot of the huge/hyper tags with other users, it's easy enough to just tag lightly and somebody else can tag further if it qualifies.

For most of those other things with the 3-way distinction, it's something like

  • Big: Above average size, but not really too out of the ordinary
  • Huge: Way larger than average, but still within the realm of possibility
  • Hyper: Impossibly and unreasonably large

There's obviously not a hard line for any body part, but some good examples could be post #2585002, post #2788307, and post #2719834, respectively. As it is right now, the gap between big and hyper is way too big imo

Updated

  • Big: Above average size, but not really too out of the ordinary
  • Huge: Way larger than average, but still within the realm of possibility
  • Hyper: Impossibly and unreasonably large

Agree with making the distinction, we have three tiers for every other relevant body part (huge_breasts, hyper_penis etc), hyper_belly is overtagged with content that is definitely not hyper because people are tagging "huge_belly" with the expectation that they will get "huge_belly".

It's a funny thing, because usually people lie to themselves when tagging wieght, so if someone is actually tagging it as huge, it is probably close to hyper :P

camkitty said:
It's a funny thing, because usually people lie to themselves when tagging wieght, so if someone is actually tagging it as huge, it is probably close to hyper :P

In practise it tends to be the reverse. The tag needs some serious cleanup - from the first page alone I'm seeing a lot of art that was obviously tagged "huge_belly" on upload, and got tagged hyper by this alias. Maybe "hyper" is a lot more expansive than I think, but none of these strike me as absurdly sized on the level of what hyper means for other body parts. The first two especially.

post #2820133 post #2813141 post #2815544

complete_degen said:
Do these usually take this long to get approved?

Often longer. There's alias and implication requests still in the wings from years ago. There's a lot to clear out but not a whole lot of admins around who can focus on them.

complete_degen said:
For most of those other things with the 3-way distinction, it's something like

  • Big: Above average size, but not really too out of the ordinary
  • Huge: Way larger than average, but still within the realm of possibility
  • Hyper: Impossibly and unreasonably large

There's obviously not a hard line for any body part, but some good examples could be post #2585002, post #2788307, and post #2719834, respectively. As it is right now, the gap between big and hyper is way too big imo

While true in general, in this case belly on its own already indicates an belly of above average size rather than just seeing the abdomen. In effect, "belly" already means "big belly", so big_belly would be more for what would be "huge belly", and huge_belly being for "hyper belly". It's a bit of a weird way to do it, so maybe could do with a bit of cleaning/readjustment, but I think all three stages are represented.

  • 1