(I couldn't make a thread because aliased already.)
Aliasing same_size_vore → vore
Reason:
This didn't get moved over when voraphillia got aliased.
Updated
Posted under General
(I couldn't make a thread because aliased already.)
Aliasing same_size_vore → vore
This didn't get moved over when voraphillia got aliased.
Updated
Was this a dupe thread by you?
Or did you mean to make that an implication?
Personally I'd vote -1 for this alias. Absorption vore is unique enough to warrant a separation from regular vore.
Updated by anonymous
Ah. I see. Yeah, I'm fairly certain they meant implication. And it's not really about changing anything, just moving the existing implications from the aliased-away tag (vorarephilia) to the actual tag (vore). And the reason is because leaving an implication attached to the older version of the tag instead of the new one will re-add the old tag back, making some images appear with both vorarephilia and vore tags no matter how many times someone tries to fix it. (I'm pretty sure many people have seen a situation like that once or twice. This is just about fixing one of those so that both absorption_vore and same_size_vore will implicate vore instead of the older vorarephilia tag. Both types of vore tags will be kept, it's just about technical organization so that the site will function properly.)
@parasprite: In future, it'd probably be best to Dmail me something like this. Since this is basically just a technical fix needed, and doesn't really need to take up a forum thread.
ETA: Also, I fixed it so that they're implicated to the correct tag now. Thanks for catching it.
Updated by anonymous
Peekaboo said:
Was this a dupe thread by you?
Or did you mean to make that an implication?
Personally I'd vote -1 for this alias. Absorption vore is unique enough to warrant a separation from regular vore.
That was definitely meant to be an implication. I just wanted to move them over.
furrypickle said:
Ah. I see. Yeah, I'm fairly certain they meant implication. And it's not really about changing anything, just moving the existing implications from the aliased-away tag (vorarephilia) to the actual tag (vore). And the reason is because leaving an implication attached to the older version of the tag instead of the new one will re-add the old tag back, making some images appear with both vorarephilia and vore tags no matter how many times someone tries to fix it. (I'm pretty sure many people have seen a situation like that once or twice. This is just about fixing one of those so that both absorption_vore and same_size_vore will implicate vore instead of the older vorarephilia tag. Both types of vore tags will be kept, it's just about technical organization so that the site will function properly.)
Yeah that was it.
furrypickle said:
]@parasprite: In future, it'd probably be best to Dmail me something like this. Since this is basically just a technical fix needed, and doesn't really need to take up a forum thread.ETA: Also, I fixed it so that they're implicated to the correct tag now. Thanks for catching it.
Will do.
Updated by anonymous