The bulk update request #1659 is pending approval.

create implication striped_body (55805) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication striped_arms (2467) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication striped_legs (2471) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication striped_hair (753) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication striped_ears (1073) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication striped_genitalia (1228) -> striped_markings (38110)
create implication spotted_body (50687) -> spotted_markings (10007)
create implication spotted_arms (984) -> spotted_markings (10007)
create implication spotted_legs (1167) -> spotted_markings (10007)
create implication spotted_hair (405) -> spotted_markings (10007)
create implication spotted_ears (425) -> spotted_markings (10007)
create implication spotted_genitalia (629) -> spotted_markings (10007)

Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

versperus said:
Reason: body markings should implicate the markings related tag, just as it does with tail. Does anyone else think it would make sense to alias _body tags to _torso tags?

I think for example octopi have a body but no torso. As the body wiki says, a body typically includes a torso, but not always.

It is confusing that when something lacks a torso, it can be said that "it doesn't have a body". If we take this sense of the word into use, we should then just alias torso into body. I prefer the current definitions we have.