The bulk update request #1686 is pending approval.

create implication reverse_stand_and_carry_position (5808) -> standing_sex (27252)
create implication reverse_stand_and_carry_position (5808) -> reverse_carry_position (274)
create implication stand_and_carry_position (5130) -> carry_position (377)
create implication stand_and_carry_position (5130) -> from_front_position (111382)
create implication reverse_stand_and_carry_position (5808) -> from_behind_position (155377)

Reason: A character standing while having sex is a prerequisite for reverse_stand_and_carry_position. stand_and_carry_position already have this implication.

I'm cleaning both tags based on my thoughts in topic #31647, and the definition of the tags makes that these implications will always be true.

Edit: I also added implications to carry_position and reverse_carry_position, since the wiki states that they are superset of the stand variations.

I agree. By name it is STAND_and_carry. And the other part is about front or behind.

I updated the BUR with some *_carry_position implications, but now I'm in doubt: should I implicate from_*_position with carry_position too? Just with the later?