A good point was brought up whilst looking at a post with dialog that talks about a kink that isn't present in the image, should there be sub categories of dirty talking in relation to kinks?
For example, a vore situation in which the predator is describing/talking about devouring someone or, in another example, someone talking about scat whilst presenting their rear end?
As it stands dirty talking only just refers to the dialog being, in some way, dirty, whether it's kink related or just sex related.
Thoughts?

somerandomvoir said:
A good point was brought up whilst looking at a post with dialog that talks about a kink that isn't present in the image, should there be sub categories of dirty talking in relation to kinks?
For example, a vore situation in which the predator is describing/talking about devouring someone or, in another example, someone talking about scat whilst presenting their rear end?
As it stands dirty talking only just refers to the dialog being, in some way, dirty, whether it's kink related or just sex related.
Thoughts?

I don't think this needs a special category. For your examples I would tag vore/scat in those images, because reading the words constitutes "TWYS" in my opinion.

I guess it would be a little unspecific, but you can look for vore+dialogue? (Or blacklist that, whichever way the river goes for you)

xeskir said:
I don't think this needs a special category. For your examples I would tag vore/scat in those images, because reading the words constitutes "TWYS" in my opinion.

I would not. The vore tag is supposed to be for posts with vore happening, not talk about vore, or vore-about-to-happen, or anything. You tag vore only if you see vore. Same goes for other kinks; talking about scat without actually defecating would not be tagged scat since you don't see it.

watsit said:
I would not. The vore tag is supposed to be for posts with vore happening, not talk about vore, or vore-about-to-happen, or anything. You tag vore only if you see vore. Same goes for other kinks; talking about scat without actually defecating would not be tagged scat since you don't see it.

So do you think there should be a sub category for kinks that are in a discussion in images? To some, even mention of certain kinks in an image can paint an entirely different one in a persons head, so whilst I agree not a direct tagging should be done, but I do think dirty talking should have sub categories for those who don't like the mentioning of these kinks either.

watsit said:
I would not. The vore tag is supposed to be for posts with vore happening, not talk about vore, or vore-about-to-happen, or anything. You tag vore only if you see vore. Same goes for other kinks; talking about scat without actually defecating would not be tagged scat since you don't see it.

I guess I have a follow up question. Lets say Im making a comic about scat but have a few pages without any viable shit but the characters are talking about it? WOuld I still tag for that? I would think I would but I dont know. I feel like context or at least relevance would mean I would have to tag the non-scat pages.

thecapedmanlloyd said:
I guess I have a follow up question. Lets say Im making a comic about scat but have a few pages without any viable shit but the characters are talking about it?

No, each page is tagged independently. If 1 page out of 100 doesn't have scat visible, you tag scat on the 99 pages that show it, and don't tag it on the 1 that doesn't.

watsit said:
No, each page is tagged independently. If 1 page out of 100 doesn't have scat visible, you tag scat on the 99 pages that show it, and don't tag it on the 1 that doesn't.

Alright, I get it but I suppose I was talking more like page 12 doesnt but every other page before and after. I'd hate to have a hot page 12 and that be the first page people saw and then got mad at the rest. They might feel grifted.