https://e621.net/posts/3289705
I’m honestly just kind of confused as too why? Looks pretty relevant too me.
Topic: How is this post “not relevant”
Posted under General
The image framing doesn't seem to show many shark-like features (half the face isn't shown, etc) so it could just be viewed as a "colorful human" which isn't relevant to the site. This is only the opinion of one approver, so the chances are somebody else can still approve it.
I can see a muzzle-like face shape, sharp teeth and a tail in the bottom left so it seems pretty relevant to me.
I don't see how it isn't relevant either, there's clearly a tail to the right, a snout... there are similar images that are even less obviously anthro which haven't had any reviewers flag it.
post #3209006
for example
I would say that's a thing that just happens sometimes. Believe it or not, mods are only humans.
What we can see of the face + what I assume is a part of the tail on the right is good enough for me.
Approved.
hungrymaple said:
post #3209006
Now that should not have been approved in the first place.
Probably just a mistake.
bitwolfy said:
post #3209006Now that should not have been approved in the first place.
Probably just a mistake.
idk the (albiet faint) countershading, stripe pattern and the overall unnatural body coloring could pass for at least a humanoid
dripen_arn said:
idk the (albiet faint) countershading, stripe pattern and the overall unnatural body coloring could pass for at least a humanoid
We still consider "humans of another color" to be human.
A humanoid tag would require some non-human body parts, like horns or elven ears.
dripen_arn said:
tad arbitrary imo but i can see how setting the bar there helps with keeping the site from being flooded with filthy filthy hoomans
The line needs to be cut off somewhere, for better or for worse