The wiki is pretty clear about it,

A pussy with only its outer parts showing. The clitoral hood, mucosa, and so on are all are fully covered by the labia majora, with nothing protruding past them.

On some pussies that meet this description, you can see a little "hole" (which is not the vagina) but nothing else, you can't see labia minora or any other specific part.

This applies as cleft_of_venus?

Example: This or this

Well if there's no labia minora or clit, then it should count since nothing is poking out.

dogenzaka said:
Well if there's no labia minora or clit, then it should count since nothing is poking out.

I've seen some clit showing images with that tag, even on the examples on the Wiki (such as this)

Yet another thing g for the pussy tag cleanup problem, I'll add it to the thread.

Theres also the awful "peach pussy" tag to consider in this too

shinyluxi0 said:
This applies as cleft_of_venus?

Example: This or this

The first example you can see a little bit of flesh (clitoral hood?) where the labia meets at the top.

watsit said:
The first example you can see a little bit of flesh (clitoral hood?) where the labia meets at the top.

It can be clitoris, which is not limited for this tag.

shinyluxi0 said:
It can be clitoris, which is not limited for this tag.

Yeah, because realistically, it sometimes is visible anyways, from the front. It's really intended for stuff like casual nudity or non-spread labia, right? But it also applies to some... truly explicit stuff. XD

To be fair, artists might draw anatomy like no hood, or clitoris in weird positions, species differences, etc. See also: slit tags for reptiles or the like (another big mess)