Hear me out but

I think the "[color]_belly" tags (e.g. "white_belly", "cream_belly") should be de-implicated from the "belly" tag. These tags just mean that the underbelly of the character is different from the rest of the character's fur, but according to the wiki page of "belly", the tag is used to denote a character is chubby in that area, which is completely different. When you think about it, the implications clutter the "belly" tag with other images that aren't related to that kink (which I do NOT have, but still).

We should instead have a different tag, like "underbelly" or "different_colored_belly", as an umbrella for the "[color]_belly" tags to fall under. Either that or change the meaning of the "belly" tag.

I think programmatically the former is more practical: a script that changes "belly" to "underbelly" IF there's a "[color]_belly" tag UNLESS there's also a "chubby" tag. It's not perfect but it'd result in less retagging than if you were to just change the meaning.

+1

I'll just quote myself from this topic #32719

dubsthefox said:
The stomach and belly tags should be overhauled. e.g. black/white/green/etc -belly implies belly. Either it should be clarified that color_belly is used on at least slightly_chubby characters, or it should be aliased to colored_abdomen and the implication of belly should be removed.

Maybe we should refer to abdomen instead of stomach or belly. cum_on_abdomen, colored_abdomen, abdominal_bulge etc.

Abdomen in general, stomach for the organ, belly if the character is chubby.

And there is a BUR for it ^^ topic #32984

*_countershading tags (see also: white_countershading ) sort of cover this, but they're not quite as specific to cover just the belly.