I dunno. First time on making up a new forum. Should we have a tag called possibly_female or possibly_male depending the looks and actions they make.

Like this for example.
https://e621.net/post/show/1142379/2017-ajin-ambiguous_gender-animated-anthro-anthro_

Yeah I know it's new but that's why the "possibly" word is there. Besides the blowjob, look at the eyes of the T-Rex. The "ambiguous_gender" is fine but the possibly_female/possibly_male tag would be nice. Thanks for reading.

-1, there is no assumed/implied genders when coming to tags. Either it looks like a male/female/herm/maleherm/dickgirl/cuntboy, it is an entity that does not possess a gender (like tentacles), or it is ambiguous_gender.

No ifs, ands, or buts, so no "possibly".

The male/ambiguous is the only pairing tag it needs.

Siral_Exan said:
-1, there is no assumed/implied genders when coming to tags. Either it looks like a male/female/herm/maleherm/dickgirl/cuntboy, it is an entity that does not possess a gender (like tentacles), or it is ambiguous_gender.

No ifs, ands, or buts, so no "possibly".

The male/ambiguous is the only pairing tag it needs.

Siral_Exan said:
-1, there is no assumed/implied genders when coming to tags. Either it looks like a male/female/herm/maleherm/dickgirl/cuntboy, it is an entity that does not possess a gender (like tentacles), or it is ambiguous_gender.

No ifs, ands, or buts, so no "possibly".

The male/ambiguous is the only pairing tag it needs.

Alright. I understand. Thank you for your response. :)