Mauzymice is victim of harassment because of a meme, she has expressed no interest to keep art of her character Sillycat here since she took down all art of her character in a previous takedown request. can something be done about it, I feel bad for her.

https://nitter.net/InuzuArt/status/1648847148400750594
https://nitter.net/sweetkiwis31/status/1656770055995027462

We don't normally add character tags to the DNP list.
We also don't accept third party takedowns and DNP requests.
So I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

silly_cat_(mauzymice)

I'll never understand why folks have to resort to harassment when they don't find a meme funny. I can understand it if it's intentionally offensive or baiting, but getting heated over a cat-dog-mouse (?) asking you if you're a boy-kisser? Are they boy-kissers in denial? Did the meme unlock their inner boy-kisser?

The world yearns for the truth

cinder said:
We don't normally add character tags to the DNP list.
We also don't accept third party takedowns and DNP requests.
So I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

What don't you understand here? Mauzymice made a takedown request, it went through, but because folks are still uploading art of her character it can't stay deleted permanently. It would help if her characters were added to the dnp list. Yet I know it's possible since I know there's an unspoken implicit dnp list for characters belonging either to minors or folks who are infamous on the site (aka the delete reason "artist was shown the door").

This is all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less. All I'm asking here is for a dnp list for characters so problems like this can be done with.

wolfmanfur said:
What don't you understand here? Mauzymice made a takedown request, it went through, but because folks are still uploading art of her character it can't stay deleted permanently. It would help if her characters were added to the dnp list. Yet I know it's possible since I know there's an unspoken implicit dnp list for characters belonging either to minors or folks who are infamous on the site (aka the delete reason "artist was shown the door").

This is all there is to it, nothing more, nothing less. All I'm asking here is for a dnp list for characters so problems like this can be done with.

For me, simply, is because "I feel sorry for them" doesn't really calls for such a thing. More so when linked something that, personally, have no real idea what's really being talked about; feel like I'm bring dropped into a middle of a topic and expect to fully understand what's going on.

cinder said:
We don't normally add character tags to the DNP list.
We also don't accept third party takedowns and DNP requests.
So I'm not entirely sure what you are trying to accomplish here.

This already exists, see paddington. And theres been 3rd party takedowns for characters for years.

See garret_mvahd_(oc) and the fact that someone was able to take down tons of art of him because they claimed their sona looked "similar"

Dont know what youre trying to accomplish by implying otherwise.

the_shinx said:
For me, simply, is because "I feel sorry for them" doesn't really calls for such a thing. More so when linked something that, personally, have no real idea what's really being talked about; feel like I'm bring dropped into a middle of a topic and expect to fully understand what's going on.

thehuskyk9 said:
I'll never understand why folks have to resort to harassment when they don't find a meme funny. I can understand it if it's intentionally offensive or baiting, but getting heated over a cat-dog-mouse (?) asking you if you're a boy-kisser? Are they boy-kissers in denial? Did the meme unlock their inner boy-kisser?

The world yearns for the truth

Feom what I underatand the character owner was underage when they created the character and was underage while producing porn commissions which landed them in hot water with people who were endangering themselves bc they did not know, and in return for being caught doing this there was major fallout.

Its less about harassment and more the character owner had been at the centre of a major issue and wished to wipe a major part of their presence.

demesejha said:
This already exists, see paddington. And theres been 3rd party takedowns for characters for years.

That sounds horrible easily abuse-able and would make far more work then there need to be. We already had tag wars, we don't need takedown wars, too.

takedowns are different than a DNP, takedowns are after the fact, DNP are before it even gets posted.
also Paddington is basically like the company is the artist, also you really shouldnt mess with companies that explicit told you that they dont want nsfw art of their characters on your site

demesejha said:

This already exists, see paddington. And theres been 3rd party takedowns for characters for years.

See garret_mvahd_(oc) and the fact that someone was able to take down tons of art of him because they claimed their sona looked "similar"

Dont know what youre trying to accomplish by implying otherwise.

demesejha said:
This already exists, see paddington. And theres been 3rd party takedowns for characters for years.

See garret_mvahd_(oc) and the fact that someone was able to take down tons of art of him because they claimed their sona looked "similar"

Dont know what youre trying to accomplish by implying otherwise.

You should see paddington yourself. Here, I'll link it for you: paddington_bear. Note that it does not have DNP status.
Now check the paddington_and_company_limited. Note that it's a copyright tag, not a character tag.
Yes, DNP status has been granted to specific sites, publishers, and copyright owners a few times. Not individual characters.
No idea what you were trying to prove by that.

No, we do not accept takedowns from third parties. It has to be done by the artist, character owner, or copyright owner. Not by a random person who feels bad about the situation.
The garret_mvahd_(oc) situation was different. From what I can see, someone took someone else's character, gave them a different name, and started making rather gross artwork with them.
Those situations are assessed on a case-by-case basis, and in that case, it was decided that it would be best if those posts were removed.
But I wasn't there for the event itself, so I don't know if there's more context I'm missing. It was six years ago, after all – a little old for something that happens all the time as you claim.

I think you just don't know what you are talking about here.

cinder said: ...

Let's just not do this, alright?
OP got their answer, that's enough.