Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #51548 benson_dunwoody -> regular_show has been approved.
Reason: Yes, his last name really is Dunwoody. Check the references on the linked page
EDIT: The tag implication benson_dunwoody -> regular_show (forum #374765) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
The bulk update request #5417 is active.
remove alias margaret_smith (0) -> margaret_smith_(regular_show) (332)
remove implication margaret_smith_(regular_show) (332) -> regular_show (2745)
Reason: We never alias the non-suffixed version to the suffixed version. This should be switched.
After:
alias margaret_smith_(regular_show) -> margaret_smith
imply margaret_smith -> regular_show
EDIT: The bulk update request #5417 (forum #374766) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
The tag implication benson_dunwoody -> regular_show (forum #374765) has been approved by @slyroon.
The bulk update request #5417 (forum #374766) has been approved by @slyroon.
The bulk update request #6672 has been rejected.
create alias margaret_smith_(regular_show) (332) -> margaret_smith (0)
create implication margaret_smith (0) -> regular_show (2745)
Reason: followup
EDIT: The bulk update request #6672 (forum #391831) has been rejected by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
"Margret Smith" is a hell of a generic name, I'm not sure I'm comfortable having a version without the *_(regular_show) as the tag name.
The bulk update request #6680 is active.
create implication margaret_smith_(regular_show) (332) -> regular_show (2745)
Reason: the other option, if preferred
EDIT: The bulk update request #6680 (forum #391871) has been approved by @slyroon.
Updated by auto moderator
The bulk update request #6680 (forum #391871) has been approved by @slyroon.
The bulk update request #6672 (forum #391831) has been rejected by @slyroon.
