Topic: plump_labia tag

Posted under General

Those shouldn't be tagged with plump_labia because you can't see the labia, it's only implied to be there and thus gets tagged with camel_toe instead. This is similar to how a post like this:

post #190098

Doesn't get tagged with penis but gets bulge or camel_tail instead.

Just had a thought: Do you think we'd get use out of a tag like plump_camel_toe?

Edit: There's a similar issue with erection for things like post #511341; rating:q erection is full of them.

Updated by anonymous

parasprite said:
Those shouldn't be tagged with plump_labia because you can't see the labia, it's only implied to be there and thus gets tagged with camel_toe instead.

That's what I was thinking, but didn't really want to go along and take valid tags off things.

parasprite said:
Just had a thought: Do you think we'd get use out of a tag like plump_camel_toe?

Edit: There's a similar issue with erection for things like post #511341; rating:q erection is full of them.

I've been looking through pussy rating:q and penis rating:q (far worse) planning to clean them up and I think that tag could definitely become useful. A tag like erect_camel_tail or whatever could come in useful for the penis one.

parasprite said:
This is similar to how a post like this:

post #190098

Doesn't get tagged with penis but gets bulge or camel_tail instead.

Slightly off topic to the rest of the thread, but there's also vpl which appears to be the same as camel_tail. Perhaps those two tags should be merged. (Edit: That post actually is tagged penis.)

Updated by anonymous

Tuvalu said:
That's what I was thinking, but didn't really want to go along and take valid tags off things.

Nah, you're good.

  • If there is a penis/pussy/balls visible then it is always explicit, anything else is tagged wrong in one way or another. No exceptions.
  • Bulge (in reference to a bulge of the pants—this tag probably needs a cleaning) and camel toe are always going to be at least questionable. The same goes for other equivalents like camel_tail and tenting.
  • Sheath can be questionable sometimes depending on how it's depicted, but it's usually explicit and never safe.
  • Sex toys and things like post #61068 and post #110333 are always going to be questionable or explicit.
  • Cum is almost always explicit (generally if it isn't obvious enough to be explicit, it isn't obviously cum either).
  • Nipples on non-male breasts are always at least questionable due to societal quirks.
  • I'd be tempted to say that feces and urine are always questionable or explicit, but I'm not sure. There are a number of posts in ~feces ~urine rating:s that contradict this.

I've been looking through pussy rating:q and penis rating:q (far worse) planning to clean them up and I think that tag could definitely become useful. A tag like erect_camel_tail or whatever could come in useful for the penis one.

Not sure about adding a new tag, but it would definitely fill the place of an implied erection a little better.

Slightly off topic to the rest of the thread, but there's also vpl which appears to be the same as camel_tail. Perhaps those two tags should be merged. (Edit: That post actually is tagged penis.)

I dislike the name of that tag myself and wanted suggest dumping it into bulge before I found the camel_tail tag. Hell, I'm starting to think that using camel_tail instead of bulge might actually work better (since bulge often gets tagged for things like neck_bulge and abdominal_bulge). Might be worth considering.

Updated by anonymous

Genjar

Former Staff

parasprite said:
I dislike the name of that tag myself and wanted suggest dumping it into bulge before I found the camel_tail tag.

Yeah.
I have no idea how we ended up using VPL as a tag for that. It's a common acronym for visible panty line, and tagging it for penis is just plain confusing and unintuitive.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1