Topic: [FAILED] (BUR): {size}_belly implications

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

The bulk update request #6193 has been rejected.

create implication huge_belly (19364) -> belly (234706)
create implication huge_belly (19364) -> big_belly (96876)
create implication hyper_belly (13593) -> huge_belly (19364)

Reason: The tags huge_belly and hyper belly should implicate belly and big_belly. This would be inline with how huge_breasts and hyper_breasts implicate breasts and big_breasts, or similar families of tag implications.

See also implication #5257 for implicate hyper_belly -> big_belly, I guess

EDIT: The bulk update request #6193 (forum #386193) has failed: Error: huge_belly already implies belly through another implication (create implication huge_belly -> belly)

EDIT: The bulk update request #6193 (forum #386193) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

The bulk update request #6194 has been rejected.

create implication huge_belly (19364) -> big_belly (96876)
create implication hyper_belly (13593) -> huge_belly (19364)
remove implication hyper_belly (13593) -> big_belly (96876)

Reason: This way, belly size is cohesive with other size tiering (x - big_x - huge_x - hyper_x) like it is for breasts.

EDIT: The bulk update request #6194 (forum #386232) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

nunyabidness2 said:
The bulk update request #6194 has been rejected.

create implication huge_belly (19364) -> big_belly (96876)
create implication hyper_belly (13593) -> huge_belly (19364)
remove implication hyper_belly (13593) -> big_belly (96876)

Reason: This way, belly size is cohesive with other size tiering (x - big_x - huge_x - hyper_x) like it is for breasts.

tbf, the ones for breasts are also kinda weird because huge_breasts implicates breasts and big_breasts, which also implicates breasts...

There's many duplicate implications like this across the site.

  • 1