So you have the realistic tag, which gives the definition "This tag is used when a character is designed in a style more artistic than in its original toon." How the tag gets used is mostly not that. On the tag_group:art page it's listed under style, which is also a bit at odds with the definition given.
Should this definition be revised to something closer to how it's actually used, should stricter use be enforced, or should it be invalidated?
Then there's realistic_feral and anatomically_correct_feral. Both are defined as 'realistic body proportions, anatomy, movements, and positions' with 'anatomically_correct' specifying a "cartoony" style. How these tags actually get used doesn't completely match up.
'Realistic' frequently gets tagged on images with anthropomorphic expressions, flat or stylized rendering, and unrealistic movement. On top of that, just searching realistic feral or photorealism feral gets results that are closer to the definition given on the wiki page.
Meanwhile there's a much smaller sample for 'anatomically_correct' but frankly it is largely images that would not look out of place in the 'realistic' results.
I do think there's utility for a tag like this- someone who's not necessarily averse to toony ferals but draws the line at dogs that are shaped like dogs might want to blacklist it. Conversely someone who likes feral but not when dogs are shaped like beans would want to search it. The issue is getting one tag with clear criteria.