If a post features a Story in its description, and the story features, for example, ctf / cock_transformation, but the picture itself doesn't feature ctf visually, should the post still be tagged with cock_transformation, or should content warnings be used in the description instead? I have seen one post that implies the answer is the latter, but I wanted to be sure.

stuff outside of the meta category should only be used to describe the visuals of the image (or animation) itself.

if it's necessary, adding content warnings to the top of the description would probably be fine.

Tags are for the image only. If the description contains topics people might have blacklisted that can't be tagged on the image itself, maybe put the story in a collapsible box with a written content warning?
Like this:

Here's how to do it:

[section=CW: cock transformation]story content here[/section]

sipothac said:
stuff outside of the meta category should only be used to describe the visuals of the image (or animation) itself.

if it's necessary, adding content warnings to the top of the description would probably be fine.

Thanks very much!

cloudpie said:
Tags are for the image only. If the description contains topics people might have blacklisted that can't be tagged on the image itself, maybe put the story in a collapsible box with a written content warning?
Like this:

CW: cock transformation

story content here

Here's how to do it:

[section=CW: cock transformation]story content here[/section]

Thanks you ^w^
Especially for that code.