I know what you must be thinking: Real porn doesn't fit with e621 style.
The problem here is that my post wasn't even porn in the literal meaning of the word. It was a naked girl photo which was edited so she has cat's ears and tail and all you can see is her upper-half.

It's a real naked lady with just cat ears. Porn or not, we don't allow those types of images. We would give it more thought if it was a photomorph like these: post #187778 post #216688 post #77150

TheHuskyK9 said:
It's a real naked lady with just cat ears. Porn or not, we don't allow those types of images. We would give it more thought if it was a photomorph like these: post #187778 post #216688 post #77150

Agreed. We had a discussion about this a while ago, and the majority of the "real" person has to be altered in some significant way (like a re-skin) to be considered a okay. Tail and ears make not a furry.

TheHuskyK9 said:
It's a real naked lady with just cat ears. Porn or not, we don't allow those types of images.

I find it understandable that some users think it's okay to post, though. Since there's already so much of it: see Saku and pool #75, for example...