Greetings and hope you're having a nice day.
To clear this up beforehand, I'm not someone who posts comments like these, nor have I ever received a warning about this. But as someone who browses this site a lot and therefor reads a lot of comments across artworks, I felt like there are several inconsistencies across the site when it comes to the creepy comments rule.
To give non-specific examples, nor any names, there have been times when comments appeared decently normal and have received a warning / record for creepy comments, example comment (altered and adjusted lightly to not be find-able): "I'd love her to be in my bed"
Now, yes, this comment essentially implies existing fantasies, but I would consider this comment to be anything but creepy. That's just me. However, in other cases I find certain comments much weirder (not necessarily creepy, but weird to write) which however remain... unnoticed. Despite the user posting comments like these from time to time. An example (altered again): "Mhh, time to really savor the ripeness~" < Actual comment scheme across the board, no records given.
Now if I were to compare these two comments, I feel like the distribution of records is switched up. While the first one appears rather harmless and doesn't really weird me out or anything, the second one in direct comparison would be more likely to draw a weird look or two from anyone reading. Not to mention that users of the first example appear to be more prone to future warnings due to their comments.
So, what actually is the criteria for creepy comments? And how is it detected / prosecuted? Just based off on user reports, or actual reviewing of individual cases?
And no, I'm not trying to bash against a site rule, but more so wanting clarification.